Wednesday 22 May 2024

From Internment to the Stars -- George Takei and our Father

Margaret and John, Mum & Dad, Verbier, Switzerland, 1973
 Dad acting the goat, as Sargent Sardoni, his army drill sarge
George Takei -- born in LA to Japanese-American parents -- was Sulu in Star Trek. “To the Stars!” 

But he doesn’t talk about that as much as he talks about how horrid the US was to inter him with his parents during WW2, from 1942 to 1945. Young George, 5 years old to 8 y.o..  While at the Rohwer Arkansas internment camp in the country, he went to school while his parents went out with the other detainees to till the fields. 

George says it was all horridly racist. I wonder. After all, the government also interned Germans, Austrians and Italians that they considered dangerous, while the US was at war with their countries. Pretty caucasian that lot. 

I first heard about George Takei and his fixation on the the internment camp on the Adam Carolla show. A show I love, with Adam being a guy I call “Mr Common Sense”. He’s had Takei on as a guest on his pod a couple of times, likes him, I think, but is also super frustrated because, says Adam,  “all George ever does is bang on about the fuxxg internment camps, ffs!”. 

Were that camps all wrong and as horrid as George says? 

Were they wrong? I’m not so sure. Imagine 100,000 people from the country that you’re now at war with. If just 1% are potential betrayers, spies say, that’s already 1,000 people. But why punish all? Well, because you don’t have time. You’re at war. Best to play it safe and put them all out of the way, on a farm. 

Horrid? I doubt it. Today it looks pretty idyllic. Maybe then it was tougher, but then what they were living was a bucolic life far from the war. And I’m sure all the parents remember the experience, and I’m betting they don’t all remember it as horrid at all. These were not like Japanese POW camps. These were internment camps for the citizens of a country that the Utied States happened to be at war with. And at the end of the war they were all released. 

I have a sailing friend here in Hong Kong who was interned with his parents, by the Japanese, at the Stanley prison facility here in Hong Kong, on the south side of Hong Kong island -- now a very upmarket tourist spot. They were treated pretty well, according to him, and he has strong memories, none really horrid. (It’s “John the Judge” and he’s still alive at last count, in his late 80s).

Anyway, what all this did was remind me that our father, in Australia, served at an Australian  Internment Camp in Hay, NSW, then known as a Prisoner of War camp. 

He got there in August 1945, close to the end of the war, and after he’d already served years fighting the Japanese in Papua New Guinea. He was there in Hay as an interpreter, as they had some Japanese prisoners. They also had some internees from Germany, Italy and Austria. I found out that there’s now a museum there, the Dunera Museum, where I learned that the German internees were mostly Jewish and had been sent over by the UK! (Still sending its convicts to Oz after all these years). 

As kids, if we asked our father about the war, it was always about his time fighting in PNG. Did you kill any Japanese Dad? Did they shoot at you? Were you scared? Did you get wounded? How was it to interrogate the Japanese prisoners? (He was an interpreter of Japanese, with Army Intelligence). I never asked him much at all about the six weeks he spent at the Hay pow camp. I wish I had. 

I found out the actual dates he was there at Hay via the open records on the Australian National Archives site. A very good, super user-friendly site. There I found 28 pages of records of our father, John Ackland Forsythe, Army number NX151703, who had served in the Australian Imperial Forces (the Army), fighting the Japanese, in Papua New Guinea at Milne Bay, Lae, Port Moresby and on the Kokoda Trail. I also found out that he’d earned five Medals, which I’d never known about. He’d not collected them, according to these army records the late 90s, when he was in his mid 80s. 

By the way, do we know how close the Japanese to invading Australia? They were already in Lae, one of the places our father served, on the north side of the Island. They were on their way across the Kokoda Trail to capture Pt Moresby, the capital, on the south side of the island (another place Dad had served), just opposite Australia, from where they would have had a straight line to our land mass.  

It was on the Kokoda Trail that our father saw action, was shot at, and captured two Japanese flags, and interrogated Japanese prisoners they’d captured. One of those flags is now in the Australian War Memorial. 

It was interesting to look at the old records, from the 1940s, written in nice fountain pen copperplate, but with military abbreviations, so not always clear. And some weird ones, like “STRENGTH” training, always in caps and which Dad seems to have done several times. 

And to see that everything he told us as kids was all confirmed. Not that I ever doubted. But it was fun nonetheless to see it there in writing: that he was in Military Intelligence, that he’d been to training to a Military Intelligence school, that he’d fought in all those places, and that he’d been awarded Gold Card treatment meaning free medical for him and Mum, for their lives, because he’d been shot at (that was the main criterion...).

And to see that there were things he hadn’t told us, perhaps because of he was a modest man: that he’d earned those medals. And that he’d been promoted quickly. Joined in early 41 as a private, promoted to Sergeant in later 41, then to Lieutenant a month later and then to Captain a year later. Also, he never made much of this, but he was medivacced out of the war zone twice to Townsville in Queensland, with serious Malaria. Which was to affect him for years after. 

And I wondered about this: that it’s easy for me, or anyone, to find those details online, from nearly a century ago. But what about us, who haven’t been to war, or the armed forces? There’s nothing about us, unless we’ve done enough to be Google-able. But still that’s nothing like an official record, on actual paper, with an actual pen and an actual person’s initials signing off that it’s all true. 

All that from listening to a podcast. 

Tuesday 21 May 2024

Is it ok to celebrate the death of Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi? (Me: YES)

I remember when Margaret Thatcher died and many on the Left gloated, were jubilant. They sang “Ding Dong the witch is dead”. I thought it all a bit off, tbf.

I do celebrate the death of Iranian president -- in that helicopter crash --  Ebrahim Raisi.

Does that make me a hypocrite? 

First off, I’m just joining in with the many Iranians who are setting of fireworks to celebrate his death. That’s the sane young people, the young Persians, who are not at all in love with a Shia Theocracy. 

Then there’s a difference between Maggie and Raisi. 

The clue is in their nicknames. Maggie was the “Iron Lady”. Strong in her belief of how Britain had to change to bring it into the 20th Century. She went after the unions, especially the Miners’ Union and broke them. That sure made her unloved amongst many. 

Raisi’s nickname? "The Butcher of Tehran”. Why that? Because he was personally responsible for the deaths of 30,000+ young people, people mainly of the Left, who had supported the return of the Ayatollah Khomenei from France to Iran, to establish the Islamic Republic in 1979. 

So there’s that. Maggie’s union-busting is not quite the same as wholesale slaughter of idealistic youth, hanged by putting a rope around their necks and raising them slowly on cranes so that they choked to death slowly. The women were first raped -- to be sure they are not virgins, because, you know, Islam is so genteel and kindly that it doesn’t allow the killing of virgins. 

Yes, Maggie is different from Raisi. One a principled woman; the other a mass-murderous psychopath today bent on eviscerating all Jews. It’s not hypocritical to be against dopey chants of “ding-dong the witch is dead” and yet to celebrate the death of the Butcher of Tehran. 

Raisi has been instrumental in all that Iran has done to make itself the Terror OG of the region, tying together all its surrogates, Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthi. With the ultimate aim of turning the region into a Shia Theocracy. 

Along the way, he’s butchered many more opponents of the regime. Which caught the eye of the leadership and successive promotions, up to president. He was also Supreme Leader in waiting. The Supreme Leader in Iran -- aka The Ayatollah -- is the one who makes the real decisions. He’s the one who decides when the mass murder of Jews will happen. He’s the one who decides when the Bomb they’re close to finalising, will be dropped on Tel Aviv. And how and when the surviving Jews will be sent to their Final Solution. 

How often have people fantasised about killing Adolf Hitler when he was a baby? Or a teenager in Vienna? Or as a young adult in Munich? That’s all fine, apparently. To do the mental experiment and to imagine how many lives could have been saved, by preemptively killing the creator of the Third Reich and the Final Solution. 

That’s why I do celebrate the death of Ebrahim Ravi. He already had a bloody history. His future would have been slaughter-on-slaughter. His death stopped that. 

Yet we must know that is death will change nothing. There will be another president in waiting. And another Supreme Leader in waiting. Still, it’s one more out of the succession and the further down the list you go, the less capable a mass murderer you are, one must presume. 

It’s the same reason I’m perfectly fine with Israel assassinating the five Iranian nuclear scientists. An Occasional Reader asked me: “surely you can’t believe it’s ok for Israel to murder Iranian nuclear scientists? Without trial? In front of family? Surely not?”. 

Oh yes, I can, I reply. I think it’s perfectly fine. 

Those scientists are NOT developing nuclear weapons for defence. They are developing a nuclear bomb -- which by some accounts they are very close to finalising -- purely to kill Jews in Israel. Their government -- their president Raisa himself! -- have said so repeatedly. Their aim is to bomb, to nuclear bomb, to nuke Israel into oblivion, so that “the rubble is dancing”. Yes, they do hate Jews that much. With a deep, visceral, unfixable (I fear) hatred. 

Killing nuclear scientists at the very least delays that. It’s the equivalent of killing the baby Hitler. If you’re on for that thought experiment, you’ve got to be on for killing would-be genocidal holocaust do-over merchants. Enablers of mass murderers, this time with Nuclear ovens.

ADDED: what did western governments do in response to Raisi’s death? They sent -- by X  --condolences to Iran and the “families of the president and others killed in the crash”. Sickening. 

Jew-hatred explained

Click above for the video
Jew-hatred explained to Joe Rogan by Gad Saad, a Lebanese Jew, now Canadian college professor of evolutionary psychology. 

Gad’s  “Six degrees of Jew”: you can find a way to blame the Jews for anything within six steps or less. 

Note the figures for religions before the onslaught of the Islamic imperial troops, in the centuries after Muhammad founded Islam in the 7th Century:
  • Egypt used to be 100% Coptic Christian. Now 90% Muslim
  • Lebanon was 60% Christian. Now 70% Muslim 
  • Iran was 100% Zoroastrian and Christian. Now 99% Muslim 
  • Syria was 100% Assyrian and Syriac Christian. Now 87% Muslim 
  • Jordan was Christian and Arabian-god Paganism. Now 98% Muslim 
Islam takes no prisoners. And when their troops arrived in these countries, with Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, Pagans, they offered them the Islamic choice: (1) Convert to Islam (2) Pay the Jizya tax (3) Be killed. 

There’s a reason there were Crusades, to try to win back some land that had been invaded and occupied by Islamic troops. But in the end the Crusades failed. And in the end, Islam is still pursuing its takeover of the rest of the west. To convert the Dar-al-Harb (land of war) to Dar-al-Islam (land of Islam). 

Club Siena, Discovery Bay, Hong Kong

Looking west at dusk

Monday 20 May 2024

PSA: The most confusing emojis of 2024

Huge swings to Trump among Black, Hispanic and Young voters

abc poll of 4,000 voters 
Percentage point swing to Trump, 2024 vs 2020:

Black: 23%

Hispanic: 17%

Young (<25 y.o.): 29%

I don’t know the history of similar polls, but these seem monstrous swings to me.

Sunday 19 May 2024

Sunset on Xena, on the way back to Hong Kong from the Philippines

 

Jing on the port rail, as we make our way back to Hong Kong over the South China sea, after the race to San Fernando in the Philippines, 13 April 2009. (A race we won!)

Deaths in Gaza War

 

Daily war deaths in Gaza from Gaza Ministry of Health
and reported in Tablet magazine


As above, but updated (by me) to May 2024
The top chart is from a Tablet article some months ago, and the bottom chart is my own one; both are based on figures announced by the Gaza Ministry of Health. Which is run by Hamas. 

1. Data Consistency: Both charts are consistent with each other and reveal a “spurious accuracy”. In no war known to man are the casualties so evenly spread day in and day out. That in itself casts doubt on the Hamas figures. 

2. Consistently Dodgy Data: Hamas figures are dodgy. Right at the beginning of the war there was an explosion at the Al-Ahli hospital on 17th October, which Hamas immediately blamed on Israel and said had killed 500 people. The world reported those figures, immediately and without question. They immediately blamed Israel. 

A short time later it became clear that the “bombing” was not a bombing at all, but an errant rocket fired by their own side, by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group. Nevertheless, the west paid little attention to the correction. And continued to report daily figures as if they were true. 

Note too that, in the bottom chart above, there’s no drop off in reported numbers killed after April, despite the fact that, until recent attacks in Rafah, there’s been a de facto ceasefire for over a month. Again, dodgy).

3. The United Nations: Hamas lap-dog. The UN was nevertheless to embarrassed enough by the obvious errata in the data, that they issued a correction on 6 May. The new figures cut in half the number of “innocent” women and children killed in the conflict.  Bearing in mind that women are often active in terrorism and that “children” includes people up to age 19, many of whom have been active since early teenage. In short, Hamas, via the Gaza Ministry of Health has falsely doubled the number of “innocent victims”. 

The willing suspension of scrutiny of casualty figures by the west, based on obviously dubious Hamas figures, has been amazing to me. But perhaps I shouldn’t have been amazed, given what we’ve seen of rampant anti-semitism across the west. 

More: the west seems consumed by the idea that in a War, an army can somehow enter enemy territory, chasing a terror group that uses civilians as human shields, including children, and somehow they will manage to kill those terrorists without killing a single civilian. Not good enough for them that the IDF of Israel has the lowest ratio of civilian to combatant deaths in any wartime in history. According to all qualified and authoritative analysts. Which is to say, not Hamas. 

Saturday 18 May 2024

“Harrison Butker Right about Men and Women”| Rich Lowry

[This is about Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker and the backlash over his graduation speech at Benedictine College, a traditionalist Catholic school, where he talked about women and  “homemaking”]

I hope I don't get into trouble for this. 

Immediate family aside, I've had three long relations with women, two in marriage. All of them had strong and important careers. All are grandmothers now.

I haven't asked them*, but I venture to guess that each would say that what they feel most fulfilled by, over their long careers, over their rich, varied and successful lives, what they are happiest about, is the wonderful children they brought up.

And that's all Harrison Butker was saying in his commencement address. Bunker being a famous NFL football star, giving a commencement speech at a Catholic college. 

He did NOT say that women should not aspire to a career. That’s a given. But he also said they should not feel ashamed to enjoy motherhood, even staying at home to bring up kids.

The well-meant movement to "liberate" women from housework has had a lot of downsides. Especially in the Black community where Big Society programs of Lyndon Johnson led to huge increases in single motherhood and fatherless children. (e.g. Liberals: “Please stop helping us” by Jason Riley).

The Left are now attacking Butker for the mere suggestion that women might want to stay at home to raise a family. That the only way a woman can fulfil herself is to spend a life toiling away at a career, even if this means no family (as it increasingly does). They are calling him a misogynist; a bigot; and, of course, a racist. They are quoting Taylor Swift now on tour, who has said she has to interest in marriage or motherhood. And that’s what to aspire to: career uber alles.

I think it’s all pretty sad. Even liberals like Bill Maher are calling out the crazies. Saying, for goodness sake, it’s just a view, and lots of people have it. Ease up.

This is yet again the danger of good intentions. Ideologically driven. The road to hell is lined with good intentions. 

*I’ve since asked one, and she confirmed my guess. Yes, the most fulfilling has been family.
Even though career was important. And important too, to the family.

/Snip:


To judge by the internet reaction, Kansas City Chiefs placekicker Harrison Butker is guilty of a dreaded double doink — a missed field-goal attempt that embarrassingly hits both uprights — with his commencement address the other day.

The NFL has distanced itself from Butker's unadorned socially conservative speech at Benedictine College, a Catholic school in Kansas. He's accused, meanwhile, of potentially driving women away from the NFL and, even worse, perhaps offending Taylor Swift by quoting one of her lyrics.

The first thing to say about this is that Butker is a traditionalist Catholic giving a speech to traditionalist Catholic students graduating from a traditionalist Catholic school. Should we be surprised he sounded like a traditionalist Catholic?

Read on…

Friday 17 May 2024

The students’ world views on Israel and Gaza

 Let's sum it up:

🤡 Israel is an apartheid state (where 2 million Arabs have full rights)

🤡 The Palestinian genocide has been going on for 76 years (during which their population grew by 400%)

🤡 Israel never wanted peace with the Palestinians (that's why it always offered them peace)

🤡 the Palestinians are willing to accept Israel's right to exist (that's why they always rejected any two state solution) 

🤡 Israel's occupation of Gaza is terrible (especially after Israel left Gaza in 2005)

🤡 Allah loves queers

🤡 Jesus was Palestinian 

🤡 Bin Laden's Letter to America TOTALLY opened my eyes 

🤡 Hamas are freedom fighters 

🤡 Google Cloud is enabling an A.I. driven genocide 

🤡 Hamas didn't rape anyone. Okay, they raped a few women, but it wasn't systematic. Okay, it was systematic, but they were settlers so they deserved it 

🤡 We have nothing against Jews. We just think Zionism is bad (that's why we target synagogues, Holocaust memorials, random Jews in the streets, etc)

🤡 Israelis are white and should go back to Europe. Okay I get it, they're mostly not white, fine, they should go back to wherever they came from. Not our problem that they were massacred everywhere. They deserved it

🤡 October 7th never happened. Okay, it did happen, but only military targets were attacked. Okay, also civilian targets, but by mistake. Okay, it was on purpose, but they are all IDF so that's okay

🤡 35,000 Palestinian civilians were killed by Israel in Gaza. 50,000 of them were women and 1,000,000 were children. The UN certified these numbers 

🤡 There are 1.7 million displaced Palestinians in Rafah that have no place to go. Okay, they all moved to Deir al Balah now. It's still wrong to enter Rafah!

🤡 Here's my diploma from Columbia University. It cost my parents $80,000 a year. I'm ripping it to shreds as protest for the genocide!

It's okay, Biden will cancel my student loan debt

"Welcome to MacDonald's. How may I help you?"

What did I miss?

H/t: Hamas Atrocities 

"Is America dictator-proof?” | The Economist

The Economist tackles a question Ive been thinking about, and concluding that even if a second President Trump did want to become a dictator it would be difficult. First because of the Constitution. And second, because of the huge array of forces that would oppose him. Not just half the country who voted Democrat would be violently (literally) against him, but also the courts, at least half Democrat and the armed forces, which are fiercely loyal to the Constitution. 

I’d add: I don’t believe that Trump has any intention of even trying to become a dictator, no matter the pearl-clutching of the Dems. I heard him say, when asked “would you try to be a dictator”, answer: “Just for a day”, and the crowd laughing. Also, he had the chance in his first term; Covid gave the perfect chance to be authoritarian. He was not. On Jan 6th he urged his followers “to peacefully and patriotically protest”. He did not call for a violent insurrection; and on the same day, he handed over the keys. But, you know, Orange Man Bad, and he big dictator-would-be. 

The Economist has a look at the question of dictatorship in America. And in their usual way have their two-bob each way, and conclude something along my lines above. That it’d be difficult. They end with a question, like whaddaweknow?  So, three-bob each way.

Still and interesting read, which for the sake of history I copy below in full. The original, May 16, 2024, is here. With thanks to The Economist

How has it come to this? After victory in the cold war, the American model seemed unassailable. A generation on, Americans themselves are losing confidence in it. Feckless war-making, a financial crisis and institutional rot have let loose a ferocity in America’s politics that has given presidential contests seemingly existential stakes. Americans have heard their leaders denounce the integrity of their democracy. They have seen fellow citizens try to block the transfer of power from one administration to the next. They have good reason to wonder how much protection their system guarantees them against the authoritarian impulse rising around the world.

“Why the Gaza protests are worrying” - The Spectator World

As a protester from the Vietnam War era I can attest that, at least in Australia where we did our protesting, in a time of conscription, we didn't hate on anyone, or stop anyone from attending classes, or scream abuse at those who didn't agree with us, or were a different ethnicity or another religion. 

And we knew a lot more about the war we were protesting; a lot more than the know-nothing students today know of the Gaza war. Or of Hamas, for that matter. (The “progressive dimwits”)

At my school, Canberra Grammar, in 1967, we held a debate on the Vietnam war, the whole school invited. I still remember the two students who took the opposite sides: both were my classmates. And looking back, I'm a little amazed that the school should do such a thing; remember that was near sixty years ago!

Ross Reid took the pro-America, pro-war side. Steve Padgham took the pro Viet-Cong, anti-war side. Even at that time most of my classmates were anti the war. As was I, in a kind of squishy way. I mean, I didn’t look into it deeply; I’m not sure why. But I guess I generally bought the idea that Ho-Ho Ho Chi-minh was just a nice guy who only wanted to unify his country under a benevolent .... something..., and I went along with that. (Ho turned out to be not that nice of a guy, but that’s another story...). 

I remember thinking Ross was brave to (1) have his own view different from the rest of us and (2) to stand up in front of the whole school, a 17-year old, arguing his (unpopular) case. But there was no cancel culture and Ross never was or never felt threatened. 

Not the case with today's students. Who (1) do not tolerate dissent from the pro-Hamas anti-Israel view and (2) are openly anti-Semitic. I prefer these day to call them “Jew haters”, for that's what they are. As made clear by the article below. And as made clear by the plethora of videos looking at the encampments and talking (when allowed) to the students. Like here .... And Suella Braverman at Cambridge (Mute Morons).

I do hope that one day they feel ashamed of their Jew hatred. They should feel ashamed. And don't give me any of that "we're only criticising Zionism" nonsense! They're not. They specifically hate Jews. 

A good article by the editors of The Spectator. 
Snip:

As the weather has warmed, it's time for that time-honored tradition — protest season. Because everyone knows the plight of the disenfranchised is best solved at 70°F. Setting up winter camp in a college quad seems unpleasant — the revolution will take place at a time, place and temperature that's convenient for America's poetry graduate assistants.

Campus protests are nothing new in America. They've been a feature of university life since at least the Vietnam War and beyond. And sure, it's fun to get wrapped up in a romantic cause you only just learned about and of which you have only a surface-level knowledge. It might give your life meaning at a time when you're trying to figure out what the point of all of this is. Like you're part of something greater than yourself. Plus, it used to be a great way to meet girls. (Nowadays, these girls are all enbies. Ask your teenager.)

 “Why the Gaza protests are worryingThe Spectator May 15, 2024

Discovery Dogs and photobombing dogs

Hannah (back) is our Byron’s girlfriend. 
Labradoodles.
In our park at Discovery Bay, Hong Kong this morning.
And later on our walk Byron invited himself into a group of people we don’t know. Is that a photo bomb? They were happy to have him there. Near the White Chapel in Discovery Bay Park Siena. 
The “White Chapel”

Wednesday 15 May 2024

Einat Wilf speaks at UN Briefing on UNRWA

Click above for the video
Einat Wilf
 is a peace activist, many years working with Labour members of Israeli government. She knows whereof she speaks. And makes the strong case that the UNRWA* is the main stumbling block on the path to peace in the Middle East. Because it is run and owned, essentially, by Hamas. Its existence requires the existence of Palestinian refugees, therefore it does nothing to reduce their numbers. That’s just in the nature of incentives. 

I’ve been banging on about how awful UNRWA is, for at least a decade. The evidence of its harm is right there in front of us. We have the receipts, as we say these days. And yet nothing is done. Because of the powerful pro-Islam lobby in the United Nations. And the reluctance of western governments to be seen as uncaring and uncharitable. It’s easier just to go along with the corrupt UNRWA. At least then you can pretend to be virtuous. 

Donald Trump removed US funding for UNRWA during his presidency. That was a good move. But was excoriated on the Left. And by most countries. He would “lose US power to act as a broker” they claimed. Yet that power increased: he gave us the Abraham Accords, the most significant move towards peace in the middle east in 70 years. 

Of course the minute Joe Biden was in power, he resumed aid to this most corrupt of organisations, the UNRWA.

The above video is very revealing, from someone who’s been inside the beast. 
========================
* UNRWA = the United Nations Relief and Works Agency. The only refugee agency in the world that is focussed on one lot of people alone, the Palestinians. It’s been going since 1949, and in that time -- 75 years !! -- the number of Palestinian refugees that it’s overseen has only risen, from under a million to now more than 5 million. As has its employees, now number some 30,000. By rights this should be classified as a major failure and should be disbanded. But it’s not; it’s seen as indispensable and any moves to disband or even restrict it are denounced. 

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees, by contrast, looks after refugees from all over the world, has a smaller workforce than UNRWA and has housed and resettled millions of refugees. 

75% of Europeans think there’s too much immigration. So, why aren’t they listened to?

 

Look at the above chart. For some reason, it excludes the UK but I know the figure there is also around 75%. With such high figures, why doesn’t the democratic system do something about it? 

Couple of thoughts: 

1. The actual implementation of any measures to control immigration is in the hands of Civil Servants. I know the Civil service, as I was in it, for Australia for about 20 years. They are all pretty much leftie and don’t like to think that they ought control immigration at all. They do indeed feel virtuous, and if they ever get to know about polls showing figures of 70% percent against too much illegal immigration they just think it’s a bunch of oiks who need to be made understand. By bringing in ever larger numbers of migrants. 

2. In Europe the situation is compounded by the supranational bureaucracy of the EU, in Brussels. They are literally out of touch and untouchable. And very much in favour of more immigration, because it’s “compassionate” and “tolerant” and so on; and to do the opposite is -- horror -- racism.

Meantime, the issue is -- to me, at least -- not so much one of numbers (which it is) but more an issue of the culture of the immigrants. When they are from Mulsim countries, with very different values in terms of how they treat women, gays, non-Muslims and other religions, and they strongly resist integration, while demanding obeisance to their own practices -- like everyone at a workplace, Muslim and non-Muslim alike at a workplace respecting the fast at Ramadan -- then we’ve got a real problem. It’s a problem today at the level of simply giving in. Either we keep giving in, and end up with an Islamic country, run on Sharia law, or we resist and that’s going to lead to confrontation. 

This was the reason I started this blog 15 years ago. I made various predictions then about the Islamisation of Europe. I was wrong on those predictions: it’s happened much faster that I thought, both on the mainland of Europe, in places like Germany, France and Sweden, and in the UK, where whole cities have been Islamised. 

Today is “Nakba Day”

My quick history lesson at the site of the SCMP article. We are supposed to mourn, with Palestinians, the loss of their land, the "Nakba". Their "Holocaust"

I don't. The "catastrophe" — and yes, it was and remains a catastrophe — was entirely self-created. It was, from day one 1947, wrong. And remains wrong. 

History could have been so much kinder if only one side had shown some Grace. I've seen Arab voices saying this. What was needed and what remains needed is Grace. Sadly those voices are rare and muted. 

By the way, today is also holiday in Hong Kong. For us, Buddha's Birthday.

1. Two states, side by side, were proposed by the new United Nations in 1946. The Jews accepted; the Arabs rejected.
2. Israel was created as a state by a majority vote in the United Nations in November 1947. (The Yes vote included Australia, which only makes the recent betrayal of Israel at the UN by our Foreign Minister all the more painful).
3. Surrounding Arab countries invaded the new Israel in early 1948.
4. Before attacking, the Arab governments told the Arabs living in the new Israel (which had welcomed them to stay) to leave, so the Arab armies could freely slaughter the Jews.
5. But… The Arab armies lost the war. And some of land that had been set aside for the new Arab state. And lost the right to return for the residents they'd told to leave — by the way, a common and regular outcome of war. (Eg, as evident in the new boundaries drawn at the very recent end of WWII).
6. This is the "Nakba". The Palestinian "Holocaust". A self-created catastrophe. For which they blame Israel. As they have continued to do ever since. It is, however, entirely on their head. As the world should never stop pointing out. (But doesn't). 

The lesson: You don't get to start a war, then demand a do-over when you lose. 

Which Hamas is trying for now. What else is a "permanent ceasefire" and withdrawal of all Israeli troops from Gaza, but the demand that Israel surrender.  Hamas want a do-over. And in this they are being supported by nitwits at western colleges. And nitwits in the Biden Administration. Blinken, Sullivan, Austin and the rest of that tawdry gang. 

Sigh…

I stand with Douglas Murray. I stand with Israel

 

Click above for the video
Yes, even if life is not perfect, even if there are deaths of innocent children, I still stand with Israel. I stand with decency and democracy and against the Death Cult of Hamas, who are out to kill all Jews. And in the process kill their own children. They say so. They say it clearly. They say “we have babies so that they can be martyred. So they can kill Jews.” They do say that, Hamas and the Fatah. They pay lifetime pensions to the families of “martyrs”. They do that. 

And so, I with Israel. Which stands for life. And for living babies. 

Hamas, a Death Cult? Why, yes, they are. They say so. Often: “We love Death more than you love life”. They do say that. And we must believe them. Because they act exactly according to what they say. And if they take over Israel, “from the River to the Sea”, they will most assuredly slaughter all the Jews. And will then move on to taking over the rest of the world, to bring Islam to the whole of humankind, because that’s what their prophet Muhammad told them to do. And in process they will happily, willingly, gloriously die. While they kill us. 

crackdown

From crackdown

Tuesday 14 May 2024

“Has America Finally Had It With Joe Biden?” | Victor Davis Hanson

Professor Victor Davis Hanson in full throat. On X. Wow!

Joe Biden’s personal approval rating is at historic lows; almost all his policies do not poll fifty percent. He is behind Trump in almost all the swing states. And now he lies serially even to sympathetic interviewers. In short, finally Biden has been exposed for what he always was and represented.

Senator and Vice President Joe Biden was always sort of a buffoon. He is by nature a grandstander who handsomely profited from his office while posing as good ole Joe from Scranton.

He is a blowhard meddler, one who proverbially has been “wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades (Robert Gates),” from dissenting on the Bin Laden raid to his trisection of Iraq scheme.

Anjem Choudary’s explanation of Islam

I've quoted Anjem Choudary before. He does set out, very clearly, if scarily, the basics of Islam when it comes into contact with non-Muslim countries. As it is doing now in the west, has been for decades, but will over time convert to Islamic societies. 

If we don't stop it. 
=========================

ADDED: Osama bin Laden, in his writings to the Muslim world (but not to westerners)* makes these three choices crystal clear. And that that’s why his Al Qaeda was (and still is) attacking the west, as on 911. 

Sure there are grievances, like the Palestine question, but even absent that, even with not a single grievance, Islam has to keep fighting, has to keep attacking the west for they (we) are infidels, unbelievers, despised kuffars. And they (we) should be offered only the three choices: (1) Submit to Islam and become a Muslim (the word “Islam” means submission) (2) Pay the Jizya tax owed by non-Muslims in Muslim lands or (3) be killed. 

Thus, in a very real sense, OBL and his mujahideen attacked us on 911 because they hate our freedoms. Hate our freedom not to be Muslim. W. Bush was right about that. And yet, in the west, the likes of Noam Chomsky, and Glenn Greenwald, buy the idea that the only reason they attack is because of grievances. They conclude, therefore, that we must try to address the grievances. By surrendering to the Palestinians, for example. 

No. No matter what we do, Islam will still be after us in the west. In the shape of a new Osama bin Laden, or in the shape of Hamas, or Hezbollah, or Fatah, or Palestinian Islamic Jihad, or Boko Haram, or the Muslim Brotherhood, or any of the rest of the theocratic-fascist groups around the world, now living deep in our western societies. Which will be western no more if we succumb to “suicidal empathy” (eg, for “refugees” for “chain migration”, for family reunions. For taking in Gazan refugees, FFS, when not a single surrounding Arab state will take them because they cause chaos). 

One man who has got this, and very clearly, is Sam Harris. I’ve rather made fun of Sam and his Trump Derangement Syndrome; but on Islam he’s rock solid. Sound. Based.

*The Al-Qaeda Reader by Raymond Ibrahim

Byron & Arlene

“The best is yet to come” | Doc Rich

Click above for the video (Doc Rich)
The Black vote in America has long been locked up by the Dems. This demographic reliably voted 90%-plus Democrat. Now they’re shifting to GOP, with a 20 point swing to the Republicans.

This clip above -- from a Black podcast of Doc Rich -- is interesting  for the guests Trump asks on stage. The first is Ottis Anderson and the second Lawrence Taylor. Both famous NFL players. Both lifetime Dem voters, now voting for Trump. They’ve got a presence, right?

The 100,000 figure was not Trump’s, but from the township of Wildwood, New Jersey. It’s Jersey Shore. New Jersey is a solid long-time Blue state, so getting that sort of crowd is quite something and surely covering the Biden camp. 

ADDED: I follow a number of Black podcasts, both left and right. Here are some, with their general leaning, Dem or Rep:

  • Doc Rich (R);
  • The Conservative Black Perspective (R);
  • Nate the Lawyer (R);
  • Charlemagne The God (D);
  • The Breakfast Club (D);
  • Stephen A. Smith (D);
  • Coach Colin (R). 

The Black vote is critical. And Black podcasts help to understand the Black vote. 

I reckon I’ve got a bit of a feel for what’s grinding the Black community through these and one of those is most certainly that they’re really, really pissed off that illegal immigrants are coming into their communities and being given lodgings at their community centres, given free smart phones, given monthly allowances, given food and clothing. While their own Black communities still suffer. 

They don’t like that, not one little bit. 

BTW: “Illegal immigrants” were first renamed “undocumented migrants” and now, most recently they’re being called “newcomers”. So nice sounding. But no, let’s not buy into that. They remain illegal. Just as I would be if I didn’t have a visa and avoided the customs people. Sure, there’s the “refugee” thing, but that’s just gaming a system that’s no longer fit for purpose. 

Trump Cope

Straws in the wind:

Fareed Zacharia, says, on CNN that Trump did better on the border issue, that he’s far more popular on handling the economy and that the current spate of legal cases said t Trump are Lawfare, that is, they are politically motivated. This from Zacharia, an anti Trumper, a major contributor on CNN, itself a huge Biden supporter. Also criticises Biden handling of Gaza. 

House Rep Eric Swallwell, a major league Trump-hater, posts on X that his local DAs and judges are “too soft on crime”. Other Dems in CA are getting angry at Governor Gavin Newsom for “losing” $20 billion spent on unsuccessfully tackling the  homeless problem.

James Carville, Democrat uber-strategist, the genius who came up with Bill Clinton’s “It’s the economy, stupid” winner-zinger in 1992, says on YouTube that Democrat propaganda is “not working”.

Talking of Bill Clinton, he recently said that the whole “tribalising” thing the Dems are obsessed by — DEI, CRT, ESG…i.e. everything is race and gender, all the woke stuff  — is not only divisive, but will ruin the country.

Bill Maher says that people have to understand that Trump is not Hitler. That if he wins the skies won’t collapse. He even acknowledges that things were “pretty good” during the Trump presidency. 

MSNBC has journalist who push back against Biden in interviews. Something never done before.

CNN these days reports (some) negatives on Biden; again, never done before. Eg, Dem strategist David Axelrod saying it was “not a good idea” for Biden to be telling the voters “you’re wrong” when they say they don’t feel as well off as before. 

It’s almost like some Dems are starting to rearrange their brains in case of a Trump win. Which polls are showing very likely. Thus: the Big Cope. 

Monday 13 May 2024

“10 Most Common Pro-Hamas Lies About Israel” | Victor Davis Hanson

I've been meaning to do my own list for a while, but as usual, being lazy works out well.
For good old history professor, polymath and all-round genius Victor Davis Hanson, aka VDH, does a list for me
You might quibble with this or that, but you can be sure that it will be well based. 
We see many, many, many of these falsehoods being touted around top universities in the U.S.  

“Biden’s Using Your Tax Dollars To Turn Out Democrat Votes” | The Federalist

Wow!

People have been wondering: given the Trump lead in the polls what could the Dems do to trip him up.

Maybe this is it. “Biden’s Using Your Tax Dollars To Turn Out Democrat Votes” by Dan Weingarten.

Note that voting by post is one aspect of this . Before Covid there was no postal voting. After it was used to great effect by the Dems during the 2020 Covid election, there's no way the Dems will ever allow the system to go back to pre Covid in-person voting only (though there are good reasons for doing so).

One to watch. Don't count on the Reps to be in top of this one. They were well behind the 8-ball on the postal voting in 2020. 

“I am not a Jew with trembling knees.”

This is not a protest against a faceless, nameless monolith. We’re standing right here, and you’re calling for our destruction.

From HeyAlma

Based on the famous retort by Israel PM Menachem Begin to then Senator Joe Biden, way back in 1982:

I would be tempted to say that our present circumstances call for a proud Jew to tell that to Joe Biden, but the fact is that he’s already been told — by Begin himself. In 1982, at a closed-door meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden had threatened Begin with cutting off military aid for Israel’s offensive campaign in Lebanon. As Tevi Troy noted in the Wall Street Journal, the story went that Begin responded in fiery outrage:

Don’t threaten us with cutting off aid to give up our principles. I’m not a Jew with trembling knees. I am a proud Jew with 3,700 years of civilized history. Nobody came to our aid when we were dying in the gas chambers and ovens. Nobody came to our aid when we were striving to create our country. We paid for it. We fought for it. We died for it. We will stand by our principles. We will defend them. And, when necessary, we will die for them again, with or without your aid.

Forty-two years later, Joe Biden has learned nothing.

Joe Biden: real good at Betrayal, something learned in his long career as a civil servant. By the way, we knew about this from the book by Justice Clarence Thomas. He tells the story of how he’s going to Senate confirmation hearing the next day, and is worried about how the issue of Anita Hill is going to hurt him. Joe assures him that there’s no problem. The next day, leading the Senate questions, Joe the Betrayer leads off by attacking Thomas over the Anita Hill issue (of which, for the record, he was found innocent). 

Joe has only honed his betrayal over the years. He now does it on a bigger stage. Afghanistan. Ukraine. Israel. 

Sunday 12 May 2024

BREAKING: US Intelligence Offer to Israel Sparks Debate Over Strategy in Rafah

The offer is to give Israel specific actionable intelligence on the whereabouts of the Yahya Sinwar, head of Hamas. And on tunnels and on where the hostages are. If they kill Sinwar and save the hostages, it's all over. 

If this is true I find it extraordinary. Revolting, in fact. That the U.S. would withhold such critical info from its major ally in the region. For what reason one can't fathom. Unless it be a simple as pique at Netanyahu. ie a Biden hissy fit? Surely not. But maybe so…. 

If you think about it, it's pretty much literally — and I mean "literally" literally — breathtaking. Surely this is malpractice. 

I mean, boggles the brain. What's Biden and Blinken and Sullivan and Austin and the rest of the ratty gang up to? Especially when they bang on and on about keeping Gazan civilians safe. Which this intel could have done if given to Israel sooner.

Sigh…

Gaza Palestinians

Letter to BBC. RE: story on Palestinians fleeing Rafah to seaside camps where, says BBC, they have no facilities:

They could have NOT voted for Hamas. 
They could have demanded Hamas surrender. 
They could have demanded Hamas hand back the hostages it illegally captured.  
They could have said they want to recognize their neighbours. 
They could have said they want to live in peace with their neighbours.

And their neighbours would have gladly helped them prosper.

But no…

They chose Hamas. And thus they chose Terror. They chose genocide. They chose tunnels and rockets. They chose rape and plunder. They chose murder and Go-pro braggadocio. 

And now they moan and complain. Because their neighbours defend themselves. And are determined to exterminate Hamas. 

Too bad. 

This is all on the Palestinians and Hamas. 

It was all in their power to build a prosperous Gaza. 

They chose Jew-hatred instead, Jew-killing instead, Jew-genocide instead.

Peter Forsythe
Hong Kong

John Forsythe, Juris Doctor (J.D.)

 

UCLA Class of 2024
(Pro-Hamas Tent-city year)
The official photo

For the record: “The Truth Behind the UCLA Protests” | Dr Phil

 

Click above for the video
Our very own are studying at UCLA. Soon to graduate, protestors permitting. That’s to say: the administration of UCLA permitting, because they’ve allowed the Tent-city to stay there, despite being against multiple College rules.... (It is not a free speech issue because the encampments violate multiple college rules on time, place and method).

The above video is a good piece of reportage by Dr Phil, a guy who I’ve known about, of course, but never really followed. He’s now got his own show.

The situation on the quad at UCLA is a microcosm of the Middle East. The Jewish students go the protesters saying they'd like to talk; they want peace. The pro-Hamas student demonstrators tell them to fuck off and they want to kill them. The Israel/Gaza thing in a nutshell on one quad.

ADDED: 400 Jewish students at UCLA cleaned up the quad on 5th May. Story on X by Amy Alkon. Apparently the damage, the graffiti, etc, will cost in the millions to fix. I don’t doubt it. 

Saturday 11 May 2024

Giving “The State of Palestine” more rights at the United Nations: the spoils of violent terrorism.

Ambassador Erdan does the dirty
Speaking during the debate on the now passed United Nations Resolution to grant more rights to The State of Palestine, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Gilad Erdan held up a tiny shredder and shredded a tiny version of the U.N. Charter. (See above vid).

Is that a smart thing to do? asks an Occasional Reader.

Yes, say I. Because it’s true. The United Nations General Assembly is shredding its own Charter. 

And I know it’s true because what the ambassador did made me go to the Resolution itself,  which says: 

Recalling that membership in the United Nations is open to all peace-loving States which accept the obligations contained in the Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations:

1. Determines that the State of Palestine is qualified for membership in the United Nations in accordance with Article 4 of the Charter of the United Nations and should therefore be admitted to membership in the United Nations; ... [Reference] [Text]

 And what is Article 4 of the Charter of the United Nations? 

1. Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations.
2. The admission of any such state to membership in the United Nations will be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.
[Reference]

There’s the catch: “peace-loving” and “peace-loving”.  You can’t get away from that loving of peace. 

BUT, the Palestinian State, run by the Palestinian Authority’ where the U.N. recognised the Palestinian Liberation Organisation as the leaders, and ruled de facto by Hamas in the Gaza strip, is most assuredly NOT “peace-loving”. 

The parties above, all Jihadist to more or even more extent, still hold to the “Three no’s policy” of Khartoum Resolution, one of which is “no peace with Israel”. 

The Charter of Hamas says that it will not recognise Israel, nor does it seek peace. It seeks the destruction of Israel, and the killing of all Jews. Everywhere in the world.

And then the procedural issue: any resolution regarding membership is to be recommended by the Security Council to the General Assembly, not the other way around. 

Thus: the United Nations, and 143 of its members, have voted:

  • To reward the terrorist attack on Israel on October 7th 2023, the worst killing of Jews since the holocaust.
  • To reward a defined terrorist organisation bent on the genocide of its neighbour and a United Nations member. 
  • To reward the Hamas tactics of using human shields, often children or even babies, to protect their cowardly “fighters”. 
  • Thoroughly ignored the very UN Charter clauses that it quotes to justify the resolution. Specifically Article 4, requiring members to be peace-loving.
  • Ignored the requirement for a “State” to have (1) a single recognised government (2) clearly defined borders (3) operate according to the rule of law.*
  • Ignored the procedural requirements of the United Nations Charter. 

Australia supported the resolution. The likes of PM Anthony Albanese and FM Penny Wong seem proud that they managed to go against our oldest ally the United States. They should instead be ashamed. For how they’ve betrayed two staunch allies and rewarded naked terrorism. And helped along the destruction of Israel, the only home of the Jews in the world, and which the new-born United Nations voted into existence in 1947. 

This all after some tawdry grandstanding by Wong, the armchair general, lecturing Israel on how it should be conduction the war. And then demanding to send an “investigator” to look into the friendly fire deaths of the food truck convoy. Stick a sock in it, Penny!

ADDED: By the way, try to find anything like the above analysis anywhere on BBC, CNN or the ABC. Nothing. Just signalling how virtuous we all are, because we care for Palestine. Ugh.

ADDED (2): Penny Wong disgraces Australia. Note that one of Wong's excuses for the awful decision to push recognition of Palestine State is that this is done against the interests of Hamas.  This was immediacy belied the very next day, when Hamas sent out a statement “Hamas welcomes the UN resolution”. Of course. They will pocket the concessions and then go on to doing what they do so well badly horribly: killing jews. 

==========================================

*What is a State? Definition from the Brittanica:

The state is a form of human association distinguished from other social groups by its purpose, the establishment of order and security; its methods, the laws and their enforcement; its territory, the area of jurisdiction or geographic boundaries; and finally by its sovereignty. The state consists, most broadly, of the agreement of the individuals on the means whereby disputes are settled in the form of laws. [Reference]

 How does “The State of Palestine” stack up?

1. “Order and security”: clearly there is none. And the responsibility for that is Hamas in Gaza and the PA on the West Bank. The “governments” of the West Bank and Gaza, such as they may be, spend their time building tunnels and trying to kill Jews. Sad but true

2. Laws and their enforcement. The State of Palestine gets a fail here too. Laws, if applied at all, are arbitrary, confiscatory and pernicious. Sharia law, sometimes: which suppresses rights of women, minorities, and non-believers. 

3. The “geographic boundary”: this is not settled because none of the peace proposals, the proposals to hand land to the Palestinians, in return for peace and recognition, has been accepted by the Palestinians. 

4. Sovereignty: The “ultimate overseer” of state power. Yet we have warring factions. Hamas, Fatah, the PLO, Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Enough to say there is no real sovereignty over all the lands claimed under The State of Palestine. 

In short: a fail. There cannot be a “state” of Palestine, if only, but at the very least, because the preconditions for a state do not exist. 

But that doesn’t bother the UNGA. Or the poodles like our Penny, who happily trot along behind, tongues out, panting for their little doggie treats of virtue points. Ad hominem, I know, but I can’t resist. 

ADDED: Just look at this lot of scoundrels and ratbags who drafted this wretched Resolution, which we, Australia, have said “yes” to. I doubt there’s a single anti-anti-Semitic place amongst them:

Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belize, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Colombia, Cuba, Djibouti, Egypt, Gambia, Guyana, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Namibia, Nicaragua, Oman, Qatar, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Sudan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Yemen and State of Palestine