John Stossel talks to various dam experts. Click to see the vid."←" to return here |
Fish ladders explained here |
The vid at top shows what's been done -- in that case in Washington State's Snake River. So that now 98-99% of Salmon make it through, past the dams, via "fish ladders". The same would be true of dams in CA.
And... and... and: the much bigger threat to Sockeye Salmon is now Seals and Sea-Lions, not getting past dams. Go figure that!
This is critical, because of the water that used to be diverted to Southern CA, but is now spilled into the sea. Which Newsome tells us we must do, because, you know, biodiversity, 'n all.
This is yet another case of the Great Thomas Sowell's dictum: "There are no Solutions, only Trade-offs". If you've traded off less water in LA, which contributed to their fearsome wildfires, well, what's the benefit in terms of Delta Smelt and Salmon saved? Do we even know this? $300 Billion in destroyed homes, 30 deaths, thousands without homes, on the one side. On the other side: how many fish saved? Trade off.
And there's another trade-off. As Stossel notes in the above vid. Namely that the amount of clean, reliable, always-on electricity generated by those destroyed dams in WA, was about the same as the electricity generated by wind farms. Imagine telling Greens that you were going to destroy all the wind farms in the state. Because of a fish, not even endangered. You can't have everything. It's all a matter of Trade Offs. No "solutions", only trade-offs.