"How do you know what the Truth is?" asks a guest at our Boxing Day Recovery Buffett.
"Good question," I answer.
Before launching into a confusing, half-baked answer to her question. Where I got lost in a tangle of brambles and a wilderness of weeds, about my time as an intelligence analyst in the Australian government, back in the 1980s. Where I had to make some judgement about which incoming Intelligence info should be passed on up the chain and which should be binned in the Classified Trash. I mean, kind of relevant, but also kind of roundabout and incoherent.
Recovered the next morning, I sent her a text saying again "good question", and that I'd not really answered it well. I wanted to add some factors. Like:
1. Primary Sources: Make sure you look at, delve into, Primary Sources. And..
2. Many Sources: Look at the media from Left to Right; where there's intersection is more likely to be truth. As I covered years ago, here. (See the Venn Diagram at top).
I should have added some more. Like:
3. Read past the Headline. I've been surprised, but now no longer, at just how many friends and rellies will happily admit to reading only the headline of an article. I had one tell me, proudly!: "I only read the headlines from the Guardian". I mean: not that you'll always get nonsense by reading only the Guardian, but for sure you'll always get only one side, the far Left side, of a story. And one of the things about seeking the Truth is that it's rarely a monopoly of just one side of an argument. If you read past the headlines, there's often times when the contents of a story itself will reverse what the headline says.
4. Social Media: We have to rely on it, at least for some of our news and for some of our Truth-seeking. But the biases are very different across the range. Reddit is way more slanted to the Dems than is YouTube, for example. The most balanced, by Pew Research results, is X, the Twitter platform that Elon Musk bought and made Free Speech its guiding light:
![]() |
| The most skewed is Bluesky, the X equivalent on the Left |
A good topic for the first day of the New Year, is it not? How do we know what The Truth is? So therefore...
I asked my AI about this Truth business. The first two items it mentioned were exactly those I texted the Boxing Day questioner above: Primary Sources. And Many Sources.
Here's the rest of AI's answer to my question "How can we tell the Truth about Event X?"
When two people hold conflicting views on "Event X", determining the truth requires systematic critical thinking rather than accepting one side outright.Absolute certainty is rare, but rigorous inquiry gets closest to reality.Start by seeking primary evidence: original documents, videos, eyewitness accounts, or data directly related to X.Avoid relying solely on interpretations.Consult diverse, credible sources representing all perspectives—reputable news outlets, academic studies, fact-checking sites (e.g., FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, Snopes), and expert analyses.Look for consensus among independent verifiers; agreement across biases strengthens reliability.Evaluate sources for credibility: Check author expertise, potential biases, and whether claims are supported by verifiable evidence, not just opinions or anecdotes.Identify logical fallacies, emotional appeals, or selective framing in arguments. Ask: What evidence would falsify each view? Be open to updating your beliefs.Truth about events is often probabilistic, not absolute—aim for the most justified conclusion based on available evidence.Recognize personal biases may cloud judgment; steelman opposing views to test them fairly.

