These Interesting Times
The Blog of Peter Forsythe in Hong Kong
Sunday, 12 April 2026
Smart Tesla crushes Dumb Toyota…
Saturday, 11 April 2026
Dog Dreams
The AI industry is built on fraud?
Given how much we worry about AI -- correctly in my view -- this law suit below is super important. @Ric_RTP explains why:
In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud.
Everyone thinks the Elon Musk vs Sam Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines.Friday, 10 April 2026
“Israel accepted, but Palestinians refused” | Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton:
“Palestinians were offered a state on the entire West Bank and east Jerusalem as its capital. Israel accepted, but Palestinians refused. They did not care about a homeland for the Palestinians. All they wanted was to kill Israelis"
This must be shared every day.
Palestinians — Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Fatah, PLO… — have never accepted a “Two-State Solution”. They want Jews OUT. Out of Arabia, where they’ve been for 3,000+ years. Expelled or killed. End of….
Bibi understood that early on. I’ve only come to realise and understand that in recent years. It may be uncomfortable. Nevertheless it’s true.
It’s the ongoing story. Israel accepts. Palestinians refuse.
Did Israel drag America into the war?
A constant attack by the Loony Left and the Marxist Right.
The short answer is “no”.
History teaches. If Israel, or, before Israel’s founding, “the Jooz” control American policy, they’re not very good at it.
Here is the full list of Israel/“the Jooz” failing to control America:
- Pre-1948 (WWII): The US enforced strict immigration quotas under the 1924 Act and refused to significantly ease entry for Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi persecution; the 1939 MS St. Louis was turned away, and requests to bomb Auschwitz were rejected.
- 1948 Arab-Israeli War: The US imposed an arms embargo on all parties; Israel could not buy weapons from America and had to source them elsewhere.
- 1956 Suez Crisis: Israel seized Sinai with allies but withdrew fully after US economic pressure and UN demands under Eisenhower.
- 1963 Dimona: The Kennedy administration demanded inspections of Israel’s nuclear reactor and threatened consequences for non-compliance.
- 1981 Osirak strike: The Reagan administration condemned Israel’s bombing of Iraq’s reactor and suspended F-16 deliveries.
- 1982 Lebanon War: The Reagan administration suspended cluster munitions and pressured Israel to halt its advance on Beirut.
- 1991 Gulf War: The Bush administration urged Israel not to retaliate against Iraqi Scud missiles to preserve the coalition; Israel complied and accepted US Patriots.
- 2003 Iraq invasion: Israel warned against it and did not push for action.
- 2015 JCPOA (Iran deal): Despite intense Israeli lobbying and Netanyahu’s congressional address opposing the deal, the Obama administration negotiated and implemented it.
- 2016 UNSC Resolution 2334: The Obama administration abstained, allowing the resolution condemning Israeli settlements; Israel had sought a US veto.
Thursday, 9 April 2026
Orchid Ovation
Victory? | Michael Doran and Gadi Taub
Yes, multiple credible reports confirm that China exerted pressure on Iran to accept a recent two-week ceasefire with the United States (and involving Israel), which was announced on April 8, 2026. The truce includes a pause in hostilities and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for safe passage. [More]
Wednesday, 8 April 2026
"Ceasefire"? Or Rearming Opportunity?
Joe Siracusa's hard-headed analysis of the "ceasefire".
Which I'm wary of, but hope for the best. That's all that can be said about it.
Hope for the best.
While knowing that the IRGC is going to rearm and that they're trolling America along. Something they've been doing since Jimmy Carter.
I'm a big "hmmm".... about this.
The Best Artemis II Moon Images (so far) | Chris Pattison
Tesla crushing it in China…
America: “No man left behind”. Australia: “No man left unprosecuted”
Is this too tough? Too far-right? Too extreme? Or is it a fair take of Australia? At least of the Left in Oz?
I confess to contemplating this from time to time: that Australia’s guilt at “Stolen land” is at once useless and dangerous.
The US spent $300 million to save one downed airman in Iran.
Australia meanwhile spent $300 million to prosecute our most decorated Afghan War veteran and charge him with war crimes.
Our government literally paid for billboards and newspaper advertisements in Afghanistan advertising rewards if random people came forward with war crimes allegations against Australian soldiers.
There is a sickness at the heart of our civilisation.
We are a country and civilization with no will to live.
Our political class believe that Australia is built on “Stolen Land” and that all white Australians are therefore stained from birth with the crime of genocide.
They therefore have no will to live. They wish they had never been born and that the nation never existed.
This is what it looks like when your elite hate themselves and hate the country. Drew Pavlou
Tuesday, 7 April 2026
The Islamic Republic of Iran: War on the United States
I post this for the record.
Which could bolster a claim -- which I have not seen the U.S. make, but I think it could -- that it has been attacked by a country, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and therefore requires help from NATO members to take defensive action.
Despite which Capitulationists, like France, Italy, Germany and Spain have refused even the minimum help, like allowing overflight of US Airforce planes. Which I have a sneaking suspicion is partly because Trump posts hurty diatribes on his Truth Social. Now, he shouldn't do that, I reckon. But to get upset about it? As France's Emmanuel Macron has done? Get over it Emmanuel!
Here is the Grok summary of attacks on the United States since the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979. All of which amount to carrying out their declaration of war, given the regime's mantra: "Death to America!"
- November 4, 1979: Iranian militants seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, taking 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. No hostages were killed. A failed U.S. rescue attempt (Operation Eagle Claw, April 1980) killed 8 U.S. servicemen.
- April 18, 1983: Iran-backed Islamic Jihad bombed the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, killing 17 Americans (63 total).
- October 23, 1983: Iran-backed Hezbollah bombed the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 U.S. service members (220 Marines, 21 others).
- June 25, 1996: Iran-backed Hezbollah al-Hejaz bombed Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, killing 19 U.S. airmen.
- 2003–2011: Iranian-backed Shia militias in Iraq, supplied and trained by Iran’s IRGC with EFPs and IEDs, killed at least 603 U.S. troops (per Pentagon).
- January 8, 2020: Iran launched ballistic missiles directly at U.S. bases in Iraq; 0 killed, over 100 U.S. troops suffered traumatic brain injuries.
Monday, 6 April 2026
Resurrection Rescue — the “Easter Miracle”
Sunday, 5 April 2026
The end of Israel | Oren Cahanovitc
Trump, Hormuz and the end of the Free Ride
Food for thought.
For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface.
The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities.
Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress.
Saturday, 4 April 2026
Holy Moonshot BatMusk!
I laughed at parts of this video. A giddy laugh. Thinking of the future in space. The next 20 years are going to be wild. One reason I do wish I weren't quite so old. I want to see it. It's the optimistic side of Humankind.
Mining on the moon, mining and manufaturing bysentient humanoid robots, sending manufactured high-tech stuff back to Earth, shot off by maglev slingshot rail, for zero cost, to anywhere on Earth.
Man oh man!
Listen to David Friedberg of the famous All-in Podcast talk about this, and how "there's everything" on the moon. Except for gravity and air. Which makes sending stuff back to Earth, easy and cost-free.
When I listened to all this, I laughed. With delight and giddiness. To think.... To think what's coming. To think of the excitement. Stay away from politics. Concentrate on the fun stuff. Rockets and space.
Friendberg said that just as the railways were the key to opening the west in the 19th Century, SpaceX is the railway of the 21st century.
Tesla will 100% merge with SpaceX, says Chamath (Palihapitiya).The combined company will have the ticker "Elon". We're long TSLA stock. Will never sell.
You can count on the All-in guys. They're tight with Elon.
Tel Aviv, 16 April 2017. Mediterranean Sea.
Friday, 3 April 2026
The Left’s hysterical opposition to the War | Victor Davis Hanson
They hid this about Israel | Daniel Greenfield
- Why the media narrative around “genocide” is being pushed
- The real reason the Israel–Palestine conflict isn’t about land
- How universities became hostile to Israel and the West
- Qatar’s influence in American institutions
- Why the UN targets Israel more than any other country
- The growing divide inside the conservative movement
- And what may be driving major voices like Tucker Carlson
Mural Wars
Thursday, 2 April 2026
Islamisation of Britain: Complete
Andrew Gold talks to Dave Rubin in Hungary. I've followed Andrew for many years. He's sound; a good analyst.
When I started this blog, 17 years ago, I did a spreadsheet predicting the Islamisation of various countries of Europe. I thought the Scandinavian countries would be first, then Germany and France, then the U.K. And my guess was around the 2050s and 60s.








