Friday, 1 May 2026
Pit Bulls and... guess who?
 |
| Click above for the Short |
Heh!
Thursday, 30 April 2026
The most foolish Islamic beliefs
“The most foolish Islamic beliefs”. Yeah, well. It’s a target rich environment.
I started this blog a couple decades ago. To record issues about Islam. As in the ideology. The thought system. Not the people. The ideas. The belief system.
The vid above is a pretty good selection and well researched.
Fact-checked by me and authorised as ☑️.
Tucker is crazier than Trump
Tucker Carlson: What? You didn’t know? That Donald Trump is a jumble of things? That he says a lot of stuff? That some is it is vengeful? That some of it is spiteful? That some of it is boastful? That some of it is apocalyptic? That some of it is plain doozy?
You don’t like his war in Iran? You’ve forgotten that he’s been banging on about this for fifty years? That he's never stopped saying that Iran must not get a nuclear weapon?
Carlson is the crazy one here. The most duplicitous one.
Rich Lowry does “Over and Out” again.
No, Ro. Joe no no “great statesman”
Ro Khanna really is a bit of a dimwit. At max a midwit.
Just after the fourth time the Dems, urged on by Ro, Dem representative for California district 17, failed in their attempt to stop Donald Trump prosecuting the war in Iran, our man Ro somehow got onto the dreary topic of Joe Biden. Said Ro “Joe Biden was a great statesman”.
Really? I thought. What comes to mind. Let’s put aside the 125 years he spent in the senate before he finally crawled into the presidency and relaxed.
Let’s concentrate on his alleged “great statesmanship” during his presidency.
What do I recall? Just going on memory. No AI.
Afghanistan: the pull out, a disaster, according even to the mainstream media.
Russia: To threats of invation of Ukraine, by Putin, Joe says: "Don't". But also, afterthought: "if you only take a bit of it, I won't do anytihng". So that's what Putin does.
Iran: Deliver $15 Billion in cash to the tyrannical theocrats. On pallets, that's eight 737 jets full of cash money. Which gets given to terrorists in Gaza, in Southern Lebanon, in Yemen. And around the world. And is stolen by their leaders, who become billionaires themselves living in Qatar. Well done, Joe.
NATO: plays soft. Makes European NATO feel softy and squishy. Happy that they're going to be looked after, defence-wise, by Ameica, so they can go on funding their comfortable welfare states.
All that? That's "great statesmanship"? Pull the other one, Ro.
People making things vs people taking things
People making things are entrepreneurs. People taking things are civil servants.
There's not a thing I can think of that civil servants actually make. And I speak as a former Australian civil servant, son of civil servants; but also in business and an entrepreneur, if only a small one, here in Hong Kong.
I've often thought and said: there's nothing like the discipline of having to meet a payroll every month. To give you perspective. And make you truly responsible. And make you appreciate the plus side of actually making things, creating services, and selling them to people who value them.
Below is a French person, @brivael, telling a tale of two types.
ReferenceElon Musk had said something that really stuck with me about resource allocation. In essence: beyond a certain level of wealth, money is no longer about consumption—it's about capital allocation.
That sentence changes everything.
Economics, at its core, is just an allocation problem. You have finite resources and infinite uses. Who decides where what goes?
Imagine a school playground. 100 kids, packs of Pokémon cards handed out at random. You let it play out. Very quickly, an order emerges. The good players accumulate rare cards, the collectors sort, the negotiators strike deals. No one planned it. And yet every card ends up in the hands of the one who gets the most value from it. The system maximizes the total happiness of the playground. That's the invisible hand.
Now bring in the teacher. She finds it unfair. Leo has 50 cards, Tom has 3. She confiscates, redistributes, enforces equality. Three immediate effects. The good players stop playing—what's the point. The bad ones have no reason to improve; they'll get their share anyway. Trades collapse. The playground is equal, and dead. She maximized equality, she destroyed happiness.
The teacher's problem is that she can't have the information the playground had collectively. That's Mises' economic calculation problem, formulated in 1920. The USSR tried to solve it for 70 years with the Gosplan. Result: shortages, lines, collapse. Not because the Soviets were stupid, because the problem is mathematically unsolvable in centralized mode.
When Musk has 200 billion, he doesn't consume it—he allocates it. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Every dollar is a bet on the future. And he has a track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. He's demonstrated he knows how to spot massive problems and allocate resources to them with spectacular returns.
The state has a track record too. Hospitals collapsing, education declining, debt exploding, public services degrading despite constantly rising budgets. The market identifies good allocators; politics identifies good communicators.
Profit isn't an end goal—it's a signal. It says: you've allocated scarce resources to a use that people value enough to pay for. The bigger the profit, the greater the value created. When Starlink turns profitable, it means millions of people in rural areas finally have internet. When a ministry runs a deficit, it means it's consuming more than it produces. One creates, the other destroys, and we call that redistribution.
In our societies, there are two categories of actors. Entrepreneurs and bureaucrats. The entrepreneur takes personal risk to spot a problem, mobilize resources, create a solution. If he's wrong, he loses. If he's right, his customers win, his employees win, his suppliers win, the state collects taxes. He's the basic cell of human progress.
The bureaucrat takes no personal risk. His salary is guaranteed. At best, he maintains an existing rent. At worst, he destroys it through overregulation, forced bad allocation, perverse incentives that discourage those who produce. But in no case does he create.
Look at the last 50 years. iPhone, civilian internet, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. All private inventions, driven by entrepreneurs, funded by venture capital. Not a single ministry has invented anything that's changed your daily life.
France has become the world's laboratory for bureaucratic drift. 57% of GDP in public spending, an absolute record. A sprawling administration, a tax system that penalizes wealth creation. Result: falling behind the United States, Germany, Switzerland. Brain drain. Deindustrialization. Exploding debt.
And the worst part is that bad allocation self-reinforces. The more the state takes, the less entrepreneurs create. The less they create, the less tax base there is. The more the state borrows and taxes. Perfect negative feedback loop. The teacher thinks she's helping, and every year the playground produces less.
In our societies, it's always the entrepreneurs who advance civilization. Bureaucrats, at best, maintain a rent; at worst, they destroy it. No society has ever progressed by taxing its creators to subsidize its managers.
The question is never who has how much. It's who allocates the next unit of resource best to maximize humanity's future. The answer hasn't changed in 200 years. It's not the civil servants.
Best company in the world
That’s easy: Tesla
Or: Tesla when merged with SpaceX. Which will happen in a year.
And will be run not by Elon Musk but by Gwynn Shotwell. According to Farzad.
It’s the everything company.
Electric Cars
Robots
Real world AI
Batteries
Lithium
Space
Data centres
Terafab chip making
Data centres in space
Humans on the moon
Lunar manufacturing
Mars
Humans on Mars
Part of Elonososphere: Which includes all of the above. Plus: Solar City. Neuralink. Boring company
There’s not a company even close to Tesla, let alone Tesla-SpaceX.
That’s my good news post for the last day of April.
Buy a single stock? Make it Tesla. Then you’ve bought the optimistic side of the future.
If you want the pessimistic side of the future… vote Democrat.
Simple as that.
[Posted half way round a walk in Siena Park, here in Discovery Bay, Hong Kong
Wednesday, 29 April 2026
Most political violence is from the Left
A list of (alleged) Right-wing political violence, compiled by the ADL: in the last three years ALL the violence they recorded was labelled “Right wing”. All of it. Hardly credible, right? Indeed not.
For I did a deep dive into the ADL stats. All of it was by neo-Nazi biker gangs. Weird. Of course these bikies are neo-Nazi nutters. But their violence is all inter-gang. It’s about drugs and territory. And Ho’s. It’s not political violence. It’s just gang rivalry.
You get the picture.
That’s the ADL. The other source the Left relies on for its BS that “most political violence is right wing” is the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Which also cooks the books. Example: All anti-Jew violence is “right wing”?! WTF?! The Left has long been anti-Semitic. For the Right, violent anti-semitism a new thing — at least in this century — by the cooks in the “Woke Reich”. Like Tucker Carlson, Candice Owens and Nick Fuentes.
Writer, podcaster, ex-Leftie, Batya Ungar-Sargon:
An example of how the Left cook the books to absolve the Left of violence in the Wall Street Journal today: A graph it published that seems to show near parity between Left and Right wing political violence is sourced to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, which by its own admission reclassified pro-Palestinian violence as "ethnonationalist".
It classifies all antisemitism as Right-wing, and all pro-Palestinian "attacks on Jewish individuals or institutions" as "ethnonationalist." This is just nakedly partisan propaganda presented as "data" and then mainstreamed in the American press. More in my column below linked.
The third assassination attempt on President Trump’s life this weekend has reignited a debate between Left and Right about where political violence in America comes from.
The Right points to the assassination attempts on the President, the murder of Charlie Kirk, the rise of Islamist terrorism, the rabid violence of the George Floyd riots, the elevation of political violence fan Hasan Piker to celebrity status in the Democratic Party, and the recent polling showing that the more liberal a person is, the more likely they are to support political violence.
On the Left, people point to January 6 as well as data purporting to show that most political violence comes from the Right. After Charlie Kirk’s assassination, The Economist ran a piece claiming to explain “what the data show,” which suggested that most political violence was a Right-wing phenomenon. Other publications cited studies from the Center for Strategic & International Studies or the CATO Institute. [Read on…]
Israel controls America…
Not.
Jeremy Boreing touches many of the points I’ve made on this here blog. (Jeremy, fwiw, is Christian).
I’ve been asked by Occasional Readers why I still support Israel.
My answer: Because it’s still right. Because it’s still good. While Hamas is still wrong. Hamas is still bad. While Iran’s tyrannical theocracy is still wrong. Is still bad.
All the noise, all the constant repetition of hate on Jews and hate on Israel, doesn’t make it right. It’s just proof, yet again, of Joseph Goebells “Big Lie” theory. Tell a big lie. The bigger the better. And tell it often. People will believe it. And today, weirdly, the Big Lie is coming from both Left and Right. (The latter now called the Woke Reich).
Well, I don’t believe the Big Lie. Nor the one about Israel. And the Jews. Or about how Hamas are brave “resistance fighters”.
I still support Israel. Unequivocally. Staunchly.
For reasons I’ve often repeated here. Which Jeremy handily summarises for me.
Jeremy’s take down of Tucker Carlson’s ludicrous claim that America has “no strategic interest” in Israel is spot on. If Israel, if the Middle East is not strategically relevant, then the term has no meaning. Of course it’s relevant. Hugely so. Israel is very much the bulwark against a major victory for extremist Islam.
Jeeemy doesn’t mention the economic benefits to America and the world of israel. It’s inventions and investments. On the high tech NASDAQ index, for example, Israel has the third highest number of companies listed, after only China and America itself.
On a recent YouTube talk, Ambassador Mike Huckabee listed the number of Israeli-Jewish inventions that have benefitted mankind. Tell me a similar list from the Arab-Muslim world. Heh…
Here’s a list from AI:
• Drip irrigation system
• USB flash drive (Disk-on-Key)
• PillCam (capsule endoscopy)
• Waze navigation app
• Israeli emergency bandage
• Mobileye driver assistance system
• ReWalk exoskeleton
• Cherry tomato
• Polio vaccine (Jonas Salk)
• Ballpoint pen (László Bíró)
• Oral contraceptive pill contributions
• ICQ instant messaging
• Firewall technology (initial versions)
• Solar water heater advancements
• Copaxone (multiple sclerosis treatment)
But, you know, “Jews be Bad”…
Nonprofits manufacture problems to stay in business
Relating to my recent post on the SPLC. The "Southern Poverty Law Centre".
And about why the Left hates Elon Musk. Basically they hate him because in his time at DOGE, he was trying to expose and cut Waste, Fraud and Abuse.
While the Dems rely on Waste, Fraud and Abuse. It's their money machine. It's the NGO Industrial Complex. It's their laundromat. Their money laundering.
Below some words on all this, from the four smart guys at the All-in podcast:
David Sacks:
“Here's the systemic problem with nonprofits and NGOs.
Let me just contrast it with business.
In business, you set up a company, the company has to make revenue, it has to make profits.
And if it doesn't, it's going to go out of business, right? Because it'll lose money.
So there's a feedback mechanism from the market.
With an NGO, nonprofit, what have you, they raise money. They don't sell things.
They fundraise from donors in order to engage in an activity, but what happens over time is the actual activities may stop mattering, and all that really matters is they're able to keep fundraising, right?
Because they're just trying to figure out a justification to keep going back to donors to get more and more money out of them.
That's what perpetuates the organization.”
Chamath:
“ Why wouldn't the Southern Poverty Law Center focus on southern poverty? Which is an issue that actually still exists in some shape or form.
Why do you call it one thing, focus on racism, and then all of a sudden whip up fake racism?”
Sacks:
“I do think that at one time in this country, civil rights was a noble cause, a very legitimate cause.
We had the legacy of segregation and Jim Crow, and there were groups that were set up to basically change that, and they succeeded.
But again, no one in an NGO or a nonprofit ever declares victory.
When Obama got elected in 2008, regardless of whether you liked Obama or not, or agreed with his politics, I thought that at that point, most people could see that this was not a racist country.
Whatever else you could say, the fact that the highest office in the land was not denied to anybody showed that this country was not holding people back based on their skin color.
And instead of just basically packing up shop and saying, ‘Okay, we've achieved our goal,’ the goalposts all got moved.
Remember, that's when the whole anti-racism thing started, was around Obama's second term.
If they just said at that time, ‘You know what, we're going to move the goalposts from equality of opportunity to equality of results. We're going to basically make everyone equal at the finish line,’ which is to say, identity socialism.
People would've said, ‘Eh, no, we're not on board for that.’
So instead, they created this whole new terminology to justify it.
And it's taken us years to unpack that and realize what's really going on.
Tuesday, 28 April 2026
The real existential threat to America: Leftist Political Violence
And no, it's not "there's violence on both sides". It's almost exclusively from the Left. From the Far-Left, if you will.
The violence is against what they claim is an "existential threat" to "our democracy", from Donald Trump.
But that's based on a delusion. That he's a tyrant. That he's Hitler. That the law enforcement officers of the state are Gestapo Goons. That people who vote for him followers are Nazis. All that is nonsense. It's objectively false. That vast swathes of Democrats truly believe it... doesn't make it true.
Instead we have the Left trying to overthrow an administration that won two elections, the latest with both the popular and the electoral college vote.
A democratically-elected administration that they try to overthrow, with lawfare, with obstruction on the streets, with obstruction in the Congress.
And with murderous violence. Repeatedly.
While denying that it's a problem of the Left. As did Obama in his reaction. But. This is the problem of the Left.
Josh Hammer is the senior editor of Newsweek. I've followed him for a while. I'm rather of his view on this whole thing, in the vid above. Which is, like, "whaaa? What are we doing?? This is crazy!"
Indeed it is. And the future of the Republic, the future of possibly the last bastion of western civilization, is at stake here.
Why does the Left hate Elon Musk?
I've been meaning to write a post on "Why does the Left hate Elon Musk?"
I would say that it's because he changed from a centre-left Democrat to a Trump supporter. So, word: Trump.
Before that, the Left loved Elon. A major player in climate change, with his Electric Vehicles and Solar City.
Then, he says he'll support Trump in 2024, and all that goes. They hate Elon. Just as they hate Trump.
The reason why he migrated to support Trump, is that he thinks that reducing the national debt is an existential issue. Neither side has been good with this, but the Trump admin tried harder. They did. With DOGE, which was to tackle Waste, Fraud and Abuse. Which sent the left into paroxysms. Because, it turns out, the whole of the NGO, the non-profit, the charity sector is one big boondoggle to wash money for Democrats. But that's another story.
Then there's a twist I heard about the other day from the likes of the creaky centenarian Democrat Strategist, James Carville, that they think Elon "stole the 2024 election" for Trump. Which is not true, because the swing states that Trump won, the 7 balance states, had zero input from Elon. What's more, the Dems spent way more money than the Reps, 1.5 billion to around 800 million. So there's that.
Now there's another reason, by the insightful Cathie Wood, of Ark Invest.
Namely that the Left hate that Elon is actually doing something for Climate Change. And if he manages to solve it, then there's nothing more for them to campaign on. A new twist on the stuff relating to NGOs. That they don't want to solve the problems they've been set up to tackle. For then the money flow stops. They have to stop feeding at the trough.
Cathie Wood just named the contradiction nobody wants to touch.
She compared Elon Musk to Thomas Edison.
Not as praise. As a pattern.
Wood: “I think he’s the Thomas Edison of our age… he wants to do the right thing to transform the lot of most of humanity.”
The media sees a reckless billionaire setting fires.
Wood sees the only person in the room building anything at all.
The gap between those two readings tells you everything about who controls the narrative.
Start with Tesla.
Wood: “Tesla was an environmental move, which I think a lot of people attacking his cars… they’ve forgotten.”
He built the exact machine environmentalists spent thirty years begging for.
Didn’t lobby for it. Didn’t write a whitepaper. Built it.
Forced every major automaker on Earth to abandon the combustion engine.
Then the second he won, the same movement made him the enemy.
Because the establishment never wanted the problem solved. They wanted the problem funded. And those are two very different things.
A solved problem kills the committee. Kills the nonprofit. Kills the careers built on managing the crisis instead of ending it.
Musk ended it. And they have never forgiven him.
SpaceX looks like an escape hatch if you never read past the headline.
Which is exactly what the press counts on.
Wood: “What we learn about material science and technologies… is going to help us here on Earth as well.”
Mars was never the exit.
It is the lab.
Build under conditions so brutal that every breakthrough changes what is possible back home.
You learn to keep a human alive in a frozen irradiated vacuum.
Fixing an energy grid on a temperate planet becomes arithmetic.
He is not running from the cradle.
He is stress-testing the technology that preserves it.
But that story doesn’t sell ads. Doesn’t move polling numbers. So they bury it under hit pieces and congressional theater and call it journalism.
Most people who reach his level stop building and start protecting what they have.
They buy senators. They buy newspapers. They buy silence.
Musk keeps picking the hardest unsolved problems on the planet and running straight at them.
That is what terrifies the establishment.
Not that he might fail.
That he might succeed without them. Without their funding. Without their approval. Without anything they can hold over his head.
A man they cannot buy is a man they cannot control.
So they do the only thing they have left.
They send the media after him.
Every legacy outlet runs the same playbook. Strip the context. Clip the quote. Frame the motive. Let the algorithm do the rest.
It has worked on every builder before him.
It will not work on this one.
They will spend their careers trying to tear him down.
He will spend his building the thing that saves them anyway.
The stones always come from inside the walls. From Dustin.
Monday, 27 April 2026
Socialism has never been tried properly!
That’s what America’ young socialists say, when confronted with “socialism has always failed”.
“But it’s never been tried properly!”
Except that it’s been tried by at least 32 countries, since Marx foisted his dreary “Das Kapital” on the world. Including tried by the luminaries of socialism: Engles, Lenin, Stalin, Mao. And their success? According to AI it’s “none”. Not one or two, or “not many”. “None”.
AI leans Left because it draws in sources that lean left. And yet, leftish as it is, AI still comes out with a clear and unequivocal answer to my Q: “how many of the 32 countries that tried socialism succeeded as socialist economies?”: A: “None”.
Yet these neophytes, these Zoomers, think they can outthink the architects of socialism? That they will have better ideas of how to implement socialism than all 32 countries? That’s some chutzpah right there.
So our young American socialists go to another angle: “we want Democratic Socialism”.
Well that can’t work either. Because of this simple contradiction:
EITHER:
Socialism = state control of the means of production. Control = planning. Planning = no choice for workers as to what to produce = no democracy.
OR:
There is worker control in the factory = democracy = no need for state planning = not socialism.
Nikos Sotirakopoulos talks about this in the vid above. Nikos is an ex Marxist. Like another of my all-time faves, Thomas Sowell. Who, when asked “why did you give up Marxism?” answered: “Reality”.
“What about Scandinavia?” our young would-be socialists cry. Scandinavian countries are not socialist, as their leaders keep telling us. They’re market based economies with a lot of social support, paid for by high taxes. But capitalist all the same.
Should we worry a lot the growing attraction to socialism in America? YES. We should.
Polling:
68% of young Democrats have a “favourable view of socialism” (Cato, March 2025).
Young Republicans by contrast: 5% have a favourable view of socialism (Harvard Youth Poll, November 2025).
Where did they get the crazy idea to love on socialism these Democrat Zoomers? Mainly at school. Education by far-left leaning teachers. Amplified by Tic Toc etc..
Why don’t young Republicans lean the same? I don’t know. Natural scepticism perhaps? Parents who influenced? Peer groups?
Sunday, 26 April 2026
Exonerating the Iranian regime. Why? | Eliza Le Bon
 |
| Click above for the X post by Elica Le Bon, Iranian-American activist |
Reza Pahlavi goes ballistic on the EU media
The Shah of Iran, Reza Pahlavi’s father, ruled Iran for 30 years. He modernised Iran. Focussed on education, health, women’s rights…. He also had Savak, his secret police arrest and torture opponents of his rule. A flawed leader. All the west can remember is the bad stuff. They recall nine of the good stuff.
Meantime the western media seem unable to recall a single bad thing done by the Islamist theocracy since it overthrew the Shah in 1979. And proceeded to murder 30,000 of its leftist supporters. And commit even greater evils recently.
If it’s a choice between someone flawed and someone evil, you go for the flawed. So why is the western media like this? I don’t get it.
Reza Pahlavi has words for the supine western press. Enamoured as it is with violent extremist Islam, in the shape of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Mad Mullahs.
Here is Reza Pahlavi:
I want to speak DIRECTLY to the people of Europe. In the past two weeks I held TWO MAJOR press conferences — one in Stockholm, one in Berlin. Over 150 JOURNALISTS showed up. We spent MORE THAN TWO HOURS with them…
And guess what?
NOT ONE SINGLE of those 150 journalists asked about the 40,000 IRANIANS SLAUGHTERED on the streets of my country on January 8th and 9th!
NOT ONE asked about the 19 political prisoners EXECUTED in the last two weeks.
When I told them 20 more are currently sentenced to death — CRICKETS. Not a damn question.
I stood right next to a grieving mother and father who lost their sons in that massacre and begged them to listen to their stories…
NOT A SINGLE ONE of those 150 journalists asked them a thing.
Let that sink in.
My 40,000 BRAVE INNOCENT COMPATRIOTS who were butchered fighting for liberty? They don’t give a damn.
They are too busy criticizing America and Israel for taking out the dictator who’s been slaughtering our people for 47 YEARS — instead of going after the regime that’s actually doing the killing!
They’d rather dig up Iran’s history than talk about what’s happening RIGHT NOW or the free democratic Iran we’re fighting for.
One EU parliament member even had the nerve to say Iranians aren’t ready for democracy. To that coward and to every fake journalist in the room I say this:
Iranians aren’t just “ready” for democracy… 40,000 of them just DIED for it! And I will NOT let their blood be in vain.
SO HEAR ME LOUD AND CLEAR:
Whether Europe stands with us or not…
Whether your journalists do their damn jobs or not…
Whether your politicians grow a spine or not…
I WILL FIGHT FOR MY PEOPLE AND MY COUNTRY.
Even if we have to do this ALONE — we are fighting until IRAN IS FREE! 🇮🇷💪
#RezaPahlaviForIran
@PahlaviReza
Another attempt on Donald Trump's life
This time at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
It was a teacher from California, now in custody with numerous charges.
Conservatives are saying "this has to stop".
They seem think that reasonable Democrats will realise that their non-stop rhetoric of hate towards president Trump has consequences. And that it ought to stop.
What these commenters don't seem to realise just how far gone are very large and influential parts of the Democratic party.
Who only want to see more of this.
When you have Democrats celebrate the cold-blooded murder of a health care executive on the streets of New York...
When you have vast swathes of Dems bemoaning that the bullet in Butler didn't go "just an inch to the right" and blow out the brains of a presidential candidate on live TV...
When you have glee, joy, celebrations, singing, dancing, at the death of a young Republican Charlie Kirk, on live television...
When you have the media and senior Dems everywhere calling the president Hitler...
When the Dems and media label all Trump supporters as Nazis....
When anti-Trump activists call law enforcement "Trump's Gestapo", when they shout to "kill all cops“ and "kill an ICE agent"...
When you have all this, these are not people the least bit interested in the message that "enough's enough".
No, for them, enough is never enough. Even the murder of a sitting president. For then it will be: we must take back all power from the democratically elected administration. And punish them.
"Elections have consequences". Today, this means: if Republicans win an election, Democrats will erupt in fury and violence.
Their only regret about this California teacher failing to to kill Trump?... is that he failed to kill Trump.
ADDED: 2.5 minutes of Democrats urging violence against Trump and Republicans.
Southern Poverty Law Centre indicted. Good.
Good, I'm glad they've been indicted. They're a crooked outfit. A scm.
The charge? Fraud.
The SPLC did good work at the beginning of its existence. They were a bunch of lawyers who set out to sue the Ku Klux Klan to oblivion. They pretty much succeeded in that.
So much so, that they ran out of "White Extremists" to go after. The Klan is pretty much non-existent.
So the SPLC helped to create and fund White Supremacist groups. That's the charge. And that's how Joe Biden was able to say, falsely, that "white supremacism is the biggest terrorist threat to America".
I've written about the SPLC for over ten years. They went after two brave ex-Muslims in Maajid Nawaz and Ayaan Hirsi Ali. That was most unfair and ridiculous. But just a small part of the big pic of how they went about fund raising, by funding extremist groups and then pointing to them: "See the challenge we've got! Money please!"
Here's some of my posts, going back over ten years. I've been leery about this outfit for ages. While, of course, the mainstream media is painting this a just the Trump admin going after them for "political reasons". What happened to "no one is above the law"?
Here are the guys from the Ruthless Podcast talking about it yesterday
And the ALL-IN podcast at 1:00:32. SPLC "are basically running a grift", David Sacks.
Saturday, 25 April 2026
Friday, 24 April 2026
This way lie Dragons, Demons and Hell: the Murderous Lunacy on the Left | Briget Phetasy
If we celebrate killing people more people will be killed. If you make it heroic, the guillotines will be set up in town squares.
I remember when the disgruntled insuree, Luigi Mangioni, killed Brian Thompson in cold blood, on the streets of New York. He was cranky that a claim for medical reimbursement had been denies by his insurer, whose boss was said Mr Thompson.
I remember reading about this, and assuming that Mangioni would be severely criticised. That it's be something like "you may have your issues with the insurer, but killing the CEO is not the way to resolve them". Or something.
But, nothing like it. The left immediately was on Mangioni's side and said that the killing was "understandable" and "justified".
Famous people agreed. I remember, to my horror, seeing comedian Bill Burr on Colbert throwing up a peace sign and shouting "Free Mangioni". To cheers from the audience.
Then came the killing of Charlie Kirk. Again, I assumed that this would be called out. Nothing like it. At least from the Left. Who could not stop themselves from celebrating.
Donald Trump was nearly killed by an assassin. The Left was only disappointed tht the bullet was just a shade too far to the left, that it missed his brain.
All of this is shocking. Though now, months later, I'm no longer shocked. Just depressed and horrified at where the Left in the United States has got to.
That promoting, that celebrating, that enabling, that encouraging, violence for political ends, is not just fine, but noble and heroic.
That way lies Hell. I've seen it in China. I've read about it in Soviet Russia. In North Korea. In Vietnam.
Yet here we are in today's America, with the New York Times giving a fawning interview to a Merchant of Death, the radical Marxist Thug, Hasan Piker.
Briget Phetasy is sound, common sensical. As is Mike Solana of Private Wires.
Immigration: Lifetime contribution of immigration by country of origin
 |
| In the red: Middle East, Africa, Latin America... See spreadsheet below for detail |
From a 2025 Netherlands IZA study of the net contribution of immigrants to the European Union, over the lifetime, by country of origin. Those in the red are countries of origin of immigrants to Europe who end up taking more from the state than they contribute to the economy.
In short, all those coming from the countries above in red, are net takers from the state, over their lifetimes in the EU. Other studies, both in the United States and Europe, show the same pattern.
It's not fully clear from the above chart, so here's the spreadsheet:
One must ask, surely, if such groups are not only a major drain on the state, but are also engaging in massive fraud, what on earth is the country doing continuing to let them into the country, let alone to encourage them. In spite of which, the pushback is always that to question the policy -- in America or the EU or Australia -- is that you're being "racist". Sure.
Also for the record. Views of Mainstream Democrats re immigration and deportation:
 |
| Mainstream Democrats THEN. Republican policy NOW |
Why the different views now?
Wow! Virginia referendum will hit HARD! Nuremberg ahoy!
 |
| 1812 cartoon of the first "gerrymander" redistricting, favouring Democrats, approved by governor Gerry. A dragon-like monster later likened to a salamander, hence "Gerry-Mander". |
Whaaaa?
Have I landed on the most boring topic of the day? What referendum? Where? Why? WTF?!
Yeah, well. It was all about “redistricting”. Or, more honestly, about redistricting's evil twin: gerrymandering.
A super quick primer: the United States lower house, the House of Representative is made up of 435 seats. The idea is that the number each party has broadly represents the country's voter split.
So: in 2024 it was Trump 50%, Kamala Harris 48%. And that’s how the House seats broadly split: 220 to Republicans and 215 to Democrats.
Each of the 50 states has a certain number of Representatives, based on its population, one representative for every 700k residents. So, a state with 7 million population gets 10 Representatives to the House. And it divides the electorates in the state (“districts” in the United States) so that they broadly represent the split between the main parties.
So far so good?
Now to Virginia. With its population of 8 million it gets to choose 11 Representatives. Right now they’re split 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans. That’s in a state that voted 52% Democrat and 48% Republican in the last election. So the 6-5 split seems fair and reasonable, right? Just a bit more for the Dems. Per the overall vote.
Ok, so what’s the problem?
It's the Gerrymander, Stupid!
Just two days ago, on 21 April, they held a referendum in Virginia to approve a proposal to change the borders of the 11 electorates. It passed by a slim margin. The result is that at the next elections, due this coming November, that the split of seats in VA will be 10-1. That’s 10 Democratic seats to just one Republican seat. 90% of the Representatives will be Democrats just 10% Republicans, in a state that’s purple, more or less split down the middle.
Plus four to the Dems; Minus four to the Reps. That's a swing of 8 right there. Enough, just by itself, to flip the House. To 219-216 to the Dems. On that one state alone. That's the HARD hit of this week's referendum.
That's the gerrymander. The redistricting, not to get a fair outcome, but to get a partisan result. And here in VA it's been done to the max.
How can this be fair? Is it legal?
No, of course it’s not fair. But it is legal.
 |
| Current districts, (6-5) top, are to change to the bottom: four divisions shifting from Red to Blue, (10-1), bottom |
If you're a Democrat, nothing. If you're a Republican, lots.
This could be the start of other gerrymandering in other Democratic-controlled, but purple states (that is, evenly split Dem-Rep).
The most immediate impact is on the November mid-term elections.
This one state, this one move in Virginia, flips the House. Gives it to the Dems. That gives them leadership of all the House Committees. And of the majority vote in the House. That will stop dead what Trump is trying to do: keeping the border closed, deporting illegal aliens, reducing taxes and regulations, pushing meritocracy vs DEI, finishing Iran...
More seriously it's the first step to the Dems winning the Trinity: presidency, senate and house in 2028. Then they will move to stack the Supreme Court with four more Justices, all Democrat, with converting Washington DC and Puerto Rico into States, giving them four more Senators and control of the Senate forever.
James "it's the economy, stupid!" Carville, senior Dem adviser, has openly advised this. And more.
This will lead to the Unaparty for America. A place run by a single party. This may be very congenial for Democrats, but obviously not for Republicans. It's not what we've always been told in western democracies that we're about: namely multi-party democracy. I like the fact that there's at least two parties. In my lifetime it's been one a bit left and another a bit right. And if you don't like one or the other, you can always, as Don Chipp said "kick the bastards out". What happens when you can't do that? Would even centrist Democrats like it if the only choice was a far-left Dem party, which is the way they're headed?
Then there's the revenge. Democrats have said they're going to "go after" Republicans who "are complicit" in supporting Donald Trump and his administration.
Nuremberg Redux?
Democrats have so convinced themselves that Trump is Hitler, that ICE agents are his Gestapo goons, and his MAGA supporters all Nazis, that they are now talking of a "Nuremberg-type" set of hearings to "bring to account" and jail all those who were "complicit" in helping the Trump administration. Including hangings, as per the original Nuremberg? Who knows. They're sufficiently deluded and filled with rage for revenge that nothing's out of court.
They're saying it out loud. And who can doubt that any craziness is possible, in today's febrile climate?
Thursday, 23 April 2026
A "Binational, Democratic, State" in Israel run by Hamas?? | Einat Wilf
 |
| Dr @EinatWilf |
This is a response to all those who think that if Hamas takes over Israel, if the Intifada does work to overthrow the Jewish state, if Islamists rule "from the River to the Sea", then all will be fine and well. That there will be a return to some pre-1948 time when apparently all was sweetness and light between Muslims and Jews in this area of the Levant.
People believing this, calling for this, include pretty much all the Left in the west, the media, all of Europe, all the Muslim countries. ie, pretty much everyone. Including the loopy fringe group of fundamentalist Jews, the Naturei Karta, recently seen on New York streets, together with Hamas and other "Palestinians" calling for the downfall of Israel, and shouting Allahu Akbar. Go figure.
Einat Wilf I've posted about before. She's super shart. Intelligent, eloquent. And not blinded by any false delusions about what might happen if Hamas or the PA took over. Which, to be clear, would be genocide -- and actual genocide -- of all Jews in the area, just as a first up, followed by killing all Jews and all non-Muslims they could get their hands on.
How do I know this? Because they say so. Over and over. It's part of their founding document, the Charter of Hamas.
Wednesday, 22 April 2026
Fun stories about Islam: Angels & Demons. Slavery & Conquest | William Federer
I know most of this stuff. I learned something, after all, from 17 years of writing about it. From the Koran, to the Hadith, from Ibn Ishaq's Life of Muhammad, to the Umdat al-salik, the sacred manual of Islamic Sharia law.
I've not heard Dr William Federer before. He's good at telling a fun and compelling story. A scary one, too.
One we need to understand and treat seriously. Because, bottom line, it's "Islam must conquer the world". That's the aim of the religious ideology foundd by Muhammad. Only then, according to pious Muslims, will there be peace. Islam style.
That's it. That's the story of Islam and its aims. One we're witnessing, at a surge, in front of us now.
Over to you, Dr Will.
Tuesday, 21 April 2026
"THE ISLAMIC SLAVE TRADE IS WORSE THAN YOU THINK" | Ali Tabrizi
Ali Tabrizi is an Iranian-Australian YouTuber and everything he says on here about the Islamic slave trade is true and verifiable.
Slavery in the Islamic states lasted far longer, and was far higher in number, than ever the Atlantic slave trade was. It was those hated European colonialists who stopped the slave trade in the Islamic middle east.
It is revealing that the Left in the west refuses to acknowledge, let alone condemn, the Islamic slave trade. Which continues to this day. Eg, openly and legally in Mauritania.
Just more hypocrisy. And wanting to highlight anything that weakens the West, like the now-defunct slave trade, while ignoring anything nasty about the Islamic world, like the still-continuing slavery.
Monday, 20 April 2026
Hasan Piker the "rancid communist" | Rich Lowry
Rich Lowry does a good job here of taking down the horrid Hasan Piker.
It's hardly believable, but the mainstream Democratic Party— the likes of the very mainstream Ezra Klein, editor of Vox — have taken to Piker. It's not just Piker”s visceral hatred of Jews. But his love of Mao, of Castro, of Stalin, of the most vile of the murderous communist tyrants, and his obvious desire to see this tyranny extended to the United States.
What is wrong with these Dems?? This is waaaay different from the Dem Party of Bill Clinton or of Barak Obama. Even of a Hillary Clinton for goodness sake. It's off the charts Left.
The most I can do here, about this Dem insanity is... shake my head... Oh dear.
And spread the insights of Rich Lowry. He's spot on.
Sunday, 19 April 2026
Hong Kong Sevens: win third Melrose Claymores
The new stadium for the famous Sevens Rugby tourney was sold out. 60,000 seats, chocker.
Everyone had fun. The crowds were big, boisterous and behaved.
Hong Kong won the Melrose Claymores Cup. A new comp for the Asian teams.
That's a fun thing for us, and to raise our spirits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)