British schoolchildren forced to accept Islam | Ali Tabrizi

 

This is truly shocking. I think it's horrifying. Not a conspiracy theory, because it's happening out in the open. Nothing is secret here. 

That letter in the middle of the post -- from the Head of a Welsh school about how they're not going  to celebrate Easter becoz "inclusivity"-- basically means this: 

We WILL celebrate Muslim Ramadan because all the non-Muslim kids (still the majority in the school) will be forced to take part, on pain of being labelled "racist". But... 

We will NOT celebrate Christian Easter, because all the Muslim kids in the school (still the minority in the school) will refuse to take part on pain of the teachers being labelled "racist". 

So... "inclusivity". Which is: include one. Not the other. Inclusio unum non est inclusio alterium... (or something). 

Scary but likely true: a Muslim guest teacher tells young kids at a school in Wales: "You will all be Muslim by Grade 6". And the State is assisting. 

Keir Starmer the traitor, is also assisting. Anyone -- like Sir Jack Ratcliffe -- suggesting that the UK is being colonised -- which is happening before our eyes -- is labelled, by Sturmer, as "racist and unacceptable" and threatened with jail. Yes, it is unacceptable, Keir, that the UK is being colonised. But... To Keir the "unacceptable" part is noticing it, and saying something about it. 

The author of the channel above, Ali Tabrizi, is a Christian refugee from Iran. I'm not on board with his whole "Jesus the saviour" stuff, as I'm a lifelong atheist. But it's not him or that ideology I fear. I fear Islam. Because it is just so damn... supremacist. It is happening so openly, so widely, so regularly, across the whole of Europe and even in my own home country of Australia, that one cannot with any honesty deny it. 

The question now is not whether or not we deny it. It's whether we'll do anything about it. My fear is we won't. In which case Islam will indeed rule the world. Not tomorrow, but about the day after. Certainly within the life of my kids. 

Oh dear... 

Bread, Butter, Breakfast, Binoculars, Book, Bifocals, Birds, Balcony

Muslim massacres of Jews up to establishment of the state of Israel

Click above to enlarge 

I’m posting the list above for the record. The search was “Muslim attacks on, or massacres of, Jews AD 600 to 1948”.  Note: “This list is not exhaustive…”.

Exhaustive or not, it clearly disproves the delusion that Muslim Arab states and Muslim residents of the region that became Israel, were incensed by the announcement of the State of Israel in 1948: “If only Israel would go away, all would be well.”

No. Muslims have been killing Jews FOREVER. Not just since the creation of Israel.

These are attacks on Jews since world's worst man, Muhammad became a man, c. AD 600. The man who Muslims insist on calling "The Perfect Man". A Perfect Man who took part in — who instigated and led — the first two of the massacres listed above, the genocide of the Banu Qurayza tribe of Jews and the subsequent “…extermination of Arabian Jewish tribes”. 

The Perfect Man who personally, proudly, beheaded over 600 male Jews in 622. 

ADDED: The Sirah, Islam’s official and authoritative biography of Muhammad, proudly notes The Perfect Man’s “compassion”. How so ? Because he ordered that only men of the Jewish tribes be killed. If in doubt, boys were made to drop their pants. If they had any pubic hair, they were deemed a man and promptly beheaded. Often by Muhammad himself. Jewish women and children were kept as slaves. That’s what counts as compassion in Islam. Up to today! Muslims are proud of this! Proud of their Perfect Man.

All of these massacres, including those personally carried out by Muhammad, “Mr Perfect”, are recorded in detail in the Sirah of Muhammad, the official Muslim biography of the "Perfect Man", by Ibn Ishaq. 

I’ve read the Sirah. It's in my library. This book is a celebratory, blood-drenched recitation of the horrors that Muhammad committed in this own lifetime. And of the atrocities, the tortures, the murders, the massacres, that he and his followers committed. In his life Muhammad personally started of took part in, 27 major battles. He was a warmonger. A swordsman. A murderer. A rapist. A Perfect Man.

Viewed Proudly up to today.

And yet somehow, we are asked to accept — as a depressing number of westerners appear to — that this is a "Religion of Peace". (Spellcheck even autocompleted "Peace" for me after I’d typed  in “Religion”; that’s how deep the brainwashing is).

Note the second of the massacres listed above: "Extermination of Arabian Jewish Tribes". Extermination! 

Muslims, Islamists, are trying to do this until today. To exterminate every last Jew from the Holy Land. Which is Holy only because the Jews were there and because Christians followed a revolutionary Jew. 

Arab Muslims occupy 99.7% of the lands in the Middle East. They cannot abide that 0.3% of the lands are occupied by Jews, the original and indigenous occupants.

They — Hamas, the PA, residents of Gaza, Muslim settlers of Judea and Samaria, surrounding Muslim states — do not want a "Two State Solution". They want every Jew cleansed from the Middle East. And then from the world. 

….

Goodness! I do seem to have gone on a bit of a rave!  When all I’d wanted to do was to post a list of Muslim massacres of Jews over the centuries.

(By the way, try the other way around —  ask AI the number of Jewish attacks or massacres of Muslims — and it’s slim pickings).

No, Janan Ganesh, I DON'T mourn the passing of the "liberal world order"

No, Janan, I don't mourn the passing of the "liberal world order." It might still have some zombie strength left—who knows? But if it does fade away, good riddance.

An old and dear friend of mine, a bit of a leftie, sent me Janan Ganesh's Financial Times piece* out of the blue. 
Ganesh urges liberals to grieve the end of this post-1945 system—the most successful international order in history, he says: unprecedented prosperity, relative peace, progress for the West. 
No country benefited more than the US. Don't apologize or resign yourself, he argues; mourn it openly, toast what it achieved, and don't let populists own the narrative. Elegiac, defiant, even haunted by a Top Gun line.
Sounds lovely in summary. But it wasn't all rosy.
I'm a traitor to my class. Yes, I am! The elite class—upper-middle, in charge of "things." I got there by job and circumstance, not choice. Fine. But now I'm a traitor because we Elites have abandoned the working and middle classes in the West. They've suffered—and it's our fault. Because of this "liberal world order" that exploded global wealth since WWII, while quietly gutting them.
I once loved it. Loved it. Post-war it ovresaw:

• Non-punitive treatment of war losers. 
• The Marshall Plan rebuilding Europe. 
• The UN, mostly funded by America. 
• GATT — the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade— which birthed the WTO. 
• The Korean War keeping South Korea safe for democratic capitalism against the North.

Mistakes? Plenty. Vietnam. Iraq. Afghanistan. But overall, it kept the world humming along.
Who gained most? Elites. Like me. Like my friend. Like most of our circle. Supporting Trump now—his focus on middle America, the working class—is apostasy from the tribe. But if Republicans won't stand for the working and middle classes, who will? The Democrats ditched them long ago for inner-city elites. We. Inner city elites. 

Since 2000—especially China's 2001 WTO entry as a "developing" country—the gains turned K-shaped: elites and big-state mercantilists soaring up; Western industrial heartlands and workers sliding down. 
Globalization lifted global GDP but hollowed out factories, fueling the resentment populists exploit. Deregulation boomed—then crashed in '08, shattering trust. Inequality exploded at home even as absolute poverty fell globally.
The UN? Thoroughly corrupted. "I am the United Nations". 
[My Dad was an Australian representative to the U.N. in the early sixties. He was pretty critical of the U.N. even then; it's got a lot worse since]
This breakdown wasn't Trump's doing. Peter Zeihan (no Trump fan) makes it clear: the rot started earlier. End of the Cold War. China's lawless mercantilism. ["The Global World Order is Collapsing"]
Trump is responding—America First, tariffs as leverage, allies paying their defense share, force used for actual peace, not nation-building fantasies.
The old order enriched rivals like China, traded sovereignty for cheap imports, and left ordinary people behind. Its passing isn't tragedy. It's correction.
I don't mourn it. I welcome what's next: nations that put their own people first.
=====================

ADDED: In the 1970s I was an Australian diplomat. I worked with American colleagues on the latest round of the GATT. We loved this new World Order we were creating. Of course we were paid to love it! But we did. At least I did, and as I recall, we all did. The mantra, by the way, was "Free Trade Good; Tariffs Bad". Which I believed right up till recently. [But that's a whole n'other issue].
*Ganesh's FT article is behind a paywall. If you have FT access, the URL is https://www.ft.com/content/3dd3f37b-a783-4f12-a837-764e9f429b01

Otherwise, copy the link in italics above and paste into the bottom box at Archive.