… because we are in Australia.
Chasing a ball in the beach always helps.
The Blog of Peter Forsythe in Hong Kong
Below from Grok. I asked it to summarise the AfD platform, in the wake of big wins for the AfD in Germany. Which are widely labelled “far-right” even “neo-Nazi”.
But these policies are close to those of a Bill Clinton. Or an Australian Labor’s Bob Hawke. Or a British Tory Party of recent years. They would never have been characterised as “far- right”. Conservative, yes, or centrist-Democrat (Bill Clinton, even Obama). But not “far-right”, let alone “neo-Nazi”. That’s how far the Overton Window has shifted Left, that anyone gives these slurs any credence at all.
I read the AfD platform below and I agree with most of it. As would anyone who yearns for a decent, well-run, safe and secure country. As have a majority of Germans in recent elections.
The push back on the“far right” and “neo-Nazi” slurs should be strong.
Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is a German right-wing populist party. Its 2025 Bundestag election program (“Zeit für Deutschland”) and longer-standing Grundsatzprogramm emphasize national sovereignty, strict limits on immigration, lower taxes and regulation, traditional energy sources, and a more direct form of democracy.
Immigration, asylum, and citizenship
This is the party’s signature issue. AfD calls for:
Economy, taxes, and welfare
The party presents itself as pro-social-market-economy and pro-Mittelstand:
Energy and climate
AfD rejects the Energiewende as implemented and questions or downplays anthropogenic climate change as the basis for current policy:
Europe, euro, and foreign policy
Society, family, security, and institutions
These positions come from the party’s own 2025 election documents and earlier basic program. Implementation would require major legal changes (including EU and constitutional law) and is contested by other parties and parts of the German state. For the full text, see the official AfD site (afd.de) under the 2025 Wahlprogramm and Grundsatzprogramm.
Germans have had enough. GB News. It’s a tactical mistake for conservative parties to refuse to deal with the AfD.
Can I ever forget, twenty five years ago, early evening here in Hong Kong, when we heard that an airliner had crashed into the World Trade Center? The North Tower. And then a second plane. Which we saw live, in real time, before even the CNN reporter who was face-to-camera, back to the burning North Tower. At which I turned to my wife and said “it’s got to be Al-Qaeda”.
Can we forget?
Can I ever forget the next day, president Bush standing on the smoking rubble, declaring “we’ll get them”? But also declaring “Islam is a religion of peace”.
At which I thought “huh?”. How does that square with what we’ve just seen? How can it be a “religion of peace” when we already knew, to a moral certainty, that men driven by this very religion had done it? Had hijacked and flown planes into two towers full of innocent people?
Which started me on my quest to learn about this “religion of peace”. On my first reading of the Quran. Of the Hadith. Of the Sirah of Muhammad. Of the Umdat Al-Salik, the Classic Manual of Islamic Jurisprudence. And my library, now in the several hundreds, of books on Islam from the apologetics to the critical.
I concluded early on that “Islam is Islam”. Its most pious votaries say so. Its religious leaders say so. Its political leaders say so. All knowledgeable observers say so.
At the same time I recognised the tactical reason for saying there’s “Islam” and there’s “Islamism”. Tackling the massive thing that is worldwide Islam is too tough. Tackling a subset is more doable.
We’ve now reached a point in the west where the dangers of Islam to our societies, to our freedoms and tolerance are so apparent that we have to face the real truth. The uncomfortable truth. That the problem is Islam itself. The problem is its doctrines. Its values. That it’s an ideology more than it is a religion. That that ideology is incompatible with western enlightenment values.
Amy Mek’s discussion on the eve of our quarter-century anniversary of the horrors at The Twin Towers:
Don’t you love it when virtue-signalling goes wrong? When some progressive ponce gets so tangled in the weeds of woke jargon that they end up spouting pure shite? We’ve had not one but two such delicious moral implosions this past week, and even better they’ve involved two of the most insufferable women to ever draw breath. Buckle in.
“Why Arabs hate Palestinians”.
[It was the Romans who came up with the term “Palestinian” as a pejorative descriptor of the Jews living in the Levant. The term was appropriated by Yasser Arafat in the 1960s to galvanise a confected “indigenous people”. Bottom line remains: “Palestinians” are Arabs. So the “hatred of Arabs for Palestinians” is like the hatred, say, of Italians for the Mafia. All same-same; just some of them very tiresome]
Two reasons for the hatred of Palestinians by Arabs. Which changed over time.
1. It started off as a strategy: to pressure the new state of Israel. Arab leaders to Arab States: Do NOT accept any Palestinian refugees. Put all the pressure on Israel.
2. Then it morphed into hatred of Palestinians for what Palestinians do. Because Palestinians bring murder and mayhem wherever they go.
A Home Office whistleblower has said what many of us have suspected for some time: that the vast majority of “asylum seeker” claims are false.In fact, he says, only around one per cent are genuine. For the state to keep foisting strong, fit, aggy men onto communities that don’t want them, while barking “They’re asylum seekers, you racists”, is wicked and preposterous.If the state wants to put a stop to the kind of vigilantism we saw in Portsmouth, then it just needs to do one simple thing: its job.
Extreme Weather and Climate Change Dashboard
The above dashboard is extremely interesting. And useful to refer to whenever one sees a claim that this or that event is “unprecedented”. Usually with the rider that it’s “due to climate change”.
The dashboard doesn’t go into causation. But it does answer the “is it the worst ever” question. Where does what’s going on fit in with history? Based in our best data.
The dashboard covers the eight indicators suggested by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
For the World:
The Global Extreme Weather and Climate Change Dashboard.
Also: Global Typhoon Tracker.
Living here in Hong Kong, typhoon (aka “hurricane”) territory, I’m very interested in this one. So far this year, the typhoon events have been very much normal.
I recently heard a call for a “new Crusade”, and I’m like.. what?! Crazy, loony right-wing Christian stuff.
I’m a long-term atheist. But how can I not support actions to stop the genocide of Christians in Nigeria? It’s been going on for decades. Virtually unnoticed. I gave money to ETP. it’s not a big sacrifice. Just that it’s a little more practical than tweeting “Bring back the children”….
Fascism is proles pretending to be aristocrats.
Communism is aristocrats trying to be proles.
-- Rob Henderson.
True, ‘dat.
This comes from a Hadith of Sahih Al-Bukhari. The Hadiths are second only to the Quran in veneration and authenticity about matters Islam.
But still, you know... Women are treated well in Islam! Islam was the first religion to give women full rights!
Yeah, right.
See my summary, from 2012, on what Islam says about Women.
![]() |
| The geniuses who predicted the demise of Twitter…. |
Twitter didn’t die, as the collective of geniuses predicted. It morphed into X and became stronger, more profitable and more influential than ever.
In August 2026: 103 MILLION downloads of X on Apps. All time record.
I never bought the negativity. Elon was right. All his naysayers were completely WRONG.
Don’t hold your breath for any contrition.
Elon bought Twitter in 2022. In 2024 a book came out suggesting that Elon had already destroyed Twitter. Character Limit: How Elon Musk Destroyed Twitter.
I bought that book and read it. I thought it was an ill-written hatchet job. But it was hugely popular. Even though it's aged like milk in the summer sun.
You can go to the book's Amazon page above, even today, and see people still hating on Elon. No matter the evidence. Which is clear: the World's Town Square is X. On anything to do with the most important issues of the time, like AI, the discussions are taking place on X.
World leaders are on X. Major company CEOs are on X. The new CEO of Apple, John Ternus just joined X. (his opening tweet: "hello").
I do not want more years because I am afraid of dying. I want them because I am not finished being curious, and curiosity is the one appetite that has never once shrunk with age.
That’s exactly how I feel. Even a decade older than Peter Diamamdis. I feel intensely curious. More than ever.
I want to see what happens in Space. On the Moon. On Mars. With self driving cars. With robots. With neural-brain networks. With Artificial Intelligence. With the just-launched Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. With the James Webb Telescope. With Dark Matter and Dark Energy. With kids and grand kids, with rellies and friends.
I want to see all of that.
Today is not like more of the past. We’re in an age where one month, one week, one day… each moment has huge and amazing things happening.
Here, on this place, Earth, Carl Sagan’s “Pale Blue Dot”. We might be the only place in the universe with life and consciousness. The only place where the universe is conscious of itself. Or not. Are we Alone? I hope not. Maybe we’ll find out about that. Maybe the Nancy Grace Roman Telescope will. I’m curious.
I am atheist, so I don't believe in Heaven. I need to be here! On this amazing Earth. I need to be Corporeal. For a bit longer, at least.
Because, like Peter the Diamandis one… I’m not finished being curious.
Iceland voted Nay! Yay!
By the time of the vote on Brexit in 2016, having looked at the cases for Brexit and for Remain, I’d come down slightly sappy, as mildly pro-Brexit.
I’ve become more strongly pro in the years since. More pro Brexit. More pro one’s own sovereignty.
Meantime there’s plucky Iceland. More important geo-strategically than its tiny size suggests. At a confluence of the Arctic, where there is increasing contention between China, Russia, America and Europe. Iceland, which just voted “NEI” to continuing talks on EU membership.
It was Icelandic Gen Zedders, the Zoomers, the youth, who brought this home. Well done, da yoof!
Iceland’s voters deserve credit for refusing to be bullied into selling out their sovereignty to Brussels – and for challenging the narrative that the EU is all that stands between civilisation and barbarism, or prosperity and penury. In an increasingly volatile world, it has never been more important for nations to retain their independence. [More…]
By the way, I do know the arguments pro EU membership. Just that I don’t find them persuasive. Ever less so, watching the shenanigans of the EU’s vast army of over-paid unelected bureaucrats, the arrogance of commission president Ursula von der Leyen. Least of all the contention that the EU is a bulwark against a Third world war, to keep Germany in check.
On that… yeah, but nah.
ADDED:
To the extent that Brexit has not gone well for Britain, that’s down to the powers that be, bureaucrats and politicians alike, muddying the waters, trying every which way to frustrate the process of disengaging from Europe. That’s been both the Right and the Left, by the way, not just the Labour Party. Labour’s new PM, Andy Burnham is trying for re-facto rejoining the EU, but that’s another story.
I recently wrote an article explaining why Islam is not merely a religion...
[Some commenters]: “Oh, sort of like Christianity?” ....
Jesus did not establish a government. He did not command an army. He did not impose a special tax on unbelievers. He did not create a civil and criminal code governing inheritance, courtroom testimony, marriage, divorce, punishment, taxation, and warfare. He did not conquer territory or rule a state.
Muhammad did.
[As recorded in Islam’s official biography of Muhammad, The Sirah of Ibn-Ishaq]
That is not an insult. It is history.
[As recorded in the Quran, the Hadith, and the Umdat Al-Saliq, Islam’s Classic Manual of Jurisprudence]
Christianity is centered on following Christ. The New Testament does not provide Christians with a comprehensive legal system to be imposed upon an entire country. Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world.
Islam is a religion, but it is not merely a religion. It is also a political, legal, and social system. Muhammad was not only a religious teacher. He was a political ruler, military commander, and lawgiver. Sharia governs far more than prayer and personal morality. It addresses marriage, divorce, inheritance, testimony, criminal punishment, taxation, warfare, and political authority.
![]() |
| Click here for the Short |
Facts. Historical Facts… and inconvenient truths. Pesky Things:
1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state.
2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state.
5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Crusader Frankish and the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.
6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there were the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
8. there was the Sassanid-Persian Empire before the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
9. Before the Sassanid-Persian Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire again, not a Palestinian state.
10. Before the Byzantine Empire there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
[PF: It was the Romans who named the area “Palestine”, referring to the Jews who lived there. It was meant as a pejorative, a form of “philistine”. See Life of Brian!]
11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Jewish Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
12. Before the Jewish Hasmonean state was the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire, not a Palestinian state.
13. Before the Hellenistic Seleucid empire, there was Alexander the Great's empire, not a Palestinian state.
14. Before Alexander the Great, there was the Persian Empire, not a Palestinian state
15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
16. Before the Babylonian Empire, the kingdoms of Israel and Judah were not Palestinian states.
17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
18. Before the Kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state.
There have been many governments there, but never a Palestine.
(Khan Fatima on X)
Me: Israel is mentioned a dozen times in the Quran. So is the Jews’ presence on that land of Israel. Muslims are almost always confounded by these facts. They are not taught them, but cannot deny them (because they are true). It destroys their “Jews are Settler-colonialists” narrative.
If today’s Muslim Palestinians want to play the game of “go back in history” it’s clear who’s always going to be the winner of “the furthest back”. It’s always the Jews, and it’s not even close.
From “Bond market revolt signals fading confidence in U.S. economic leadership”, Nicholas Spiro in the South China Morning Post:
Two years ago, the prospect of a trade war between the United States and Canada, two of the world’s most closely integrated economies, would have been unthinkable. However, US President Donald Trump’s recklessness and capriciousness know no bounds.
Last week’s breakdown in negotiations between the North American neighbours, which triggered the imposition of US tariffs of 50 per cent on a wide range of Canadian goods, showed the degree to which Trump’s trade policies are vindictive, politicised and self-defeating.…
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez demurred when ABC’s Jonathan Karl asked her if she was prepared to run for president in 2028. “I’m focused on winning the midterms,” she replied. But she was quick to admit that she hadn’t “ruled out the possibility.” Neither have Democratic primary voters.
In the extremely preliminary polling of the 2028 Democratic primary electorate, the self-described socialist from New York typically trails better-known candidates like Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, and even Pete Buttigieg. On the eve of the “invisible primary,” however, in which presidential candidates corner donors and influencers in advance of a campaign, the oddsmaker Kalshi has put Ocasio-Cortez in the pole position in the race for the party’s presidential nod.
Today [26 August] the Department of State, in partnership with the Department of the Treasury, is announcing the designation of Autistici/Inventati as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.
Autistici/Inventati (A/I Collective) is an Italy-based extremist group that builds and operates the digital infrastructure for violent Antifa cells and other far-left militants across the world.
A/I’s cadre of radical hackers and tech developers provide a full spectrum of services – including encrypted chats and email, web hosting, secure video conferencing and streaming, anonymity shields, and a suite of other technological tools – to Marxist, anarchist, and other left-wing extremist groups in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere.
These tools are specifically designed to support the operations of far-left terrorist networks, built to enable them to organize, recruit, communicate, disseminate propaganda, share target information and tactics, and carry out violent attacks – all while remaining anonymous, untraceable, and beyond the reach of the law.
Wow! You should read what terrorism these guys have facilitated around the world recently.
If you donate to A/I you risk a fine of $US 1 million and ten years jail. And so you should.
I support being tough on groups that are out to destroy capitalism and the West. We must confront those who want to destroy the Enlightenment, who aim to impose a communist-tyranny to replace our free-market democracy. We do have to fight back.
This is one strong way to do it. Attack the money! Attack the technology infrastructure. [perhaps better described as “counter-attack in self-defence”]
These A/I guys from Italy are the Internet for Terrorism. They’re AI for Subversion.