Thursday, 31 March 2022
Both these actions only harm OC2S. The Road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Wednesday, 30 March 2022
Only 1% of tested positive in Shanghai have symptoms. Does that even count as a disease? If 99% who catch it don’t have symptoms?
China’s fear is a repeat of Hong Kong. Where we were so naive to Omicron, exactly because we had been successful with early Zero Covid, so got a huge spike, so China fears their own huge spike. And they too have lots of non-vaccinated elderly. So they too could get a huge, world-beating spike in deaths as well. So it’s all resting on crushing the virus. Especially as Xi Jinping gears up for the 20th Party Congress in November.
Note the PPE in the photo above: that’s common all over China now.
Tuesday, 29 March 2022
|Daily cases per million. Only Israel had more|
|Daily deaths per million. No other place had higher|
|The character above is Zhàn,”War”. Kind of odd stuck there by itself|
For background here is a good BBC Explainer of a few days ago.
Commenters at the site point out something I’d posted about before: how much stronger China’s military is, than before, and than Russia. Also Taiwanese numbers only half of Ukraines. Then again, I, guessing Taiwan's military is better equipped and better trained than Ukraine’s.
ADDED: How fast things change. Here the thought is that Russia’s attack in Ukraine was quick, the West’s response so weak that it made attack on Taiwan more likely. No longer can we say the West's response is weak, nor that the Russian advance so quick. That was exactly a month ago.
ADDED (2): The triggering thing would be a Taiwanese declarations of independence. Better the status quo, which is de facto independence.
Some silly commenters equate nuclear power with nuclear weapons. Not same.
In Shanghai almost all cases discovered by mass testing, were without symptoms. IOW, the people didn’t even know they had it.
Meantime, businesses in Shanghai are comps,img about the arbitrary rules. People are getting p’d off with Zero Covid policy. There’s also panic buying. How long for Zero Covid? Problem is now it’s a matter of pride. They’ve been telling the rest of the world how well thy e done and lecturing the rest of us in how to handle the virus. Fact that Omicron is different hasn’t sunk in.
Monday, 28 March 2022
|Take that you … you … comedian… you!|
The actor, Will Smith. The comedian Chris Rock (also an actor). The standing ovation: Oscar audience after Smith’s blubbing talk of “love”. Yeah, right, just after you just bitch-slapped a fellow actor.
What’s going in here is assault for the “honour” of a wife, the but of a joke. What next? Honour killings? Applauded by the Hollywood Filmerati?
You just know, don’t you, that has Will Smith been a white man, no chance on god’s earth that he would have been given a standing ovation. He would have been, correctly and loudly, demolished.
Oh, the hypocrisy.
Reminds me of my time as the Big Boss of Austrade in East Asia back in the 1990s. Had Offices throughout the region, China, Korea, Vietnam, HK. Maybe 300-odd staff. Our best thinkers-outside-the-box were in China, especially Shanghai. Our most “by-the-book”, don’t-step-outside-the-rules, were our staff in Hong Kong. Jing says that’s because how well the Brits trained them be loyal bureaucrats. Whatever. It struck me at the time. And we’re suffering for this lack of flexibility right now in this pandemic.
And…”How fifth wave exposes cracks in HK government”. Click screenshot:
“HK restaurants despair over checking vaccine status”. Why are HK restaurants doing government’s job for it? When we know that vaccine mandates don’t work. The restaurants are abiding by the law. But the law in this case is an ass. We know from many places — Israel, US, Europe and Australia, have tried vaccine passes and given up on them because they don’t work. Either in stopping the spread of the virus or encouraging vaccine take up.
Sunday, 27 March 2022
And says you got to keep active, or else you’re waiting for death. Which reminds me of the Chinese triptych: you’re either waiting for death, fearing death or courting death. 等死，怕死，找死. Be brave. Be courting death; taking risks.
He arrived in the US aged 8, in 1957, with his mother, same year I arrived in Australia. Neither one of us spoke English at the time. He and mother from Hungary. We from Italy. He and his mother refugees from Hungary where she had been in a Nazi concentration camp. We, my family, from an embassy posting to Italy.
iPad,it’s the man and his accomplishment. And his practical, grateful, views in life.
His band, KISS, is starting on its Final World Tour. The reason it’s the last is the outfits KISS wear. The boots weigh like bowling balls. He says he can’t be clomping around on stage with 50 pounds of costume, at age 75. He’ll keep going. But more in the Keith Richards mode: sneakers and jeans. I like the guy. He is, as they say, based. (Watch)
Saturday, 26 March 2022
|Click to go to vid. It’s a hoot|
Also today: an article by Phil Chan and Nicola de Jager, “Turning a deaf ear” suggesting we adopt a “focused protection” strategy per the March 2020 Barrington Declaration which was hammered at the time because it was didn’t fit the then narrative of widespread undifferentiated lockdowns and NPIs until vaccines. (And even then, for us here in Hong Kong). So interesting that’s it’s now being talked about again, and in the South China Morning Post:
Friday, 25 March 2022
In the US, violent and property crime has jumped in the last two years. After the George Floyd death by police, the subsequent riots, and then the pandemic. And it’s jumped an average of 44% during the Biden administration.
Most crime affected cities are run by Democrats -- 85% to 15%. You could object that that’s because most cities in the US are run by Democratic mayors. And that’s correct. But that figure is 60-40 for the top 100 cities. So there’s still 25 percentage points more violent crime to account for, that’s down to Democratic mayors.
If you want clean cities, reduced homelessness, less violent and property crime, safer neighbourhoods, and you live in the US and have a vote, on the odds alone you’d have to vote Republican. If you care about public order and safety.
“HKU expert questions need for people to wear masks while hiking, as city prepares to relax social distancing”
The move to relax public health measures in Hong Kong means masks should no longer be mandatory while exercising outdoors, especially when it comes to hiking in country parks, according to an epidemiologist who has often publicly disagreed with government policy.
Professor Ben Cowling, head of the division of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of Hong Kong, said considering the green spaces in the city as being “high risk” was “inconceivable”. He rated country parks as being at the “lowest of low-risk settings”.
|Many comments online here|
“… Singapore outdoor mask mandates would be axed, fully-vaccinated travellers could anger the country duty-free, and …a full resumption of air and land travel with Singapore.”
Thursday, 24 March 2022
Wednesday, 23 March 2022
Some have argued that a global metropolis should “live with the virus”, yet that is divorced from the reality of a densely populated city with high mobility and a serious ageing issue. Hong Kong cannot afford to “lie flat” or the runaway virus will surely spiral out of control, ruining people’s lives and grinding the city to a halt. [So says Liu Guangyuan in today’s SCMP]
Liu Guangyuan is Beijing’s man in Hong Kong, so of course, when he says “jump” our apparatchiks ask "how high”?
He says the above, and all the rest of the Hong Kong government also say: that it’s a “fight”, a “battle” and that “it’s clear that taking avoidance measures like masking and social distancing reduces the virus”. That if we don’t the “runaway virus will spiral out of control”.
As daily Covid-19 infections continue to decline, one may think the city’s ongoing fifth wave will simply fade away. But if previous battles are any reference, victory may only follow from the vigorous enforcement of social-distancing and health-control regulations
But is it true? Not by the experience in other countries. My excel chart of Stringency Index (from Oxford Uni, via OWIF, and cases/million):You can just eyeball this to note that there’s no obvious -- jumps out at you -- correlation between how much you lockdown and how many cases you have. If you’re not happy with eyeballing, then I’ve done the Correlation coefficients, for a dozen or so countries, which show, on average, no statistically significant relation between lockdown stringency and case rates. It’s not just me (though it was first me, back in 2020), but all Johns Hopkins University and recently The Lancet all of which conclude the same: there’s no statistically beneficial effect of NPIs such as lockdowns, masking, etc.
Yet people don’t like the science, so they ignore the science. Or quibble with methodologies. And tell us we have to be “brave”, we have to “keep fighting”, we’re “in a battle”, and so on. Whereas it was always the case that that wasn’t so, and is even more the case now with super-contagious Omicron.
A few more charts of Cases per million, since Omicron, with Stringency Indices, added by me. at the time there was either an increased or decreased stringency. Look closely and you see: no obvious correlation:
|The correlation is positive, when it should be negative|
|For both UK and Italy, there is no statistically significant|
correlation between the Stringency and the Case numbers
|Same story with France and the US. The waves happened, no |
matter the Stringency of NPIs
All bankrupt for a policy which has had no effect in the Omicron wave. As we see from other countries where there’s no correlation between strictness of NPIs and virus case and death rates. Our government and its advisers, mainland and local, are in deep delusion.
To repeat: a policy of protecting the vulnerable and elderly would have controlled deaths while sustaining livelihoods.
Tuesday, 22 March 2022
|Click here for the online chart|
Note the statement below the chart above: “About 10 times lower fatality rate for those aged above 60 and fully vaccinated”. Didn’t look quite right to me, just on looking at the chart. I did the figures:
|NFV = Not Fully Vaxed|
Look at the highlighted bit above
and it’s a recipe for forever restrictions and fear. We are actually told by government advisers that we should “not stop worrying”. Oh dear.
The “advisers" keep talking about having reached a plateau. But have a look at the 7-day rolling average of cases per million. Look like a plateau?Our World in Data show similar patterns. There is no reason we should be any different. IOW, our Omicron wave is nearly finished.
Monday, 21 March 2022
|Eating out in Hong Kong’s current lockdown. It’s welfare theatre|
There’s no benefit from dividers; it’s probably better to have none
Chinese medicine had its advantages in the prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of Covid-19 patients, with the government to distribute about 1 million boxes of such items to residents. [From here] ~ Pomona Sprout – Hogwarts Herbology professor and Head of Hufflepuff House
Actually, no, it’s not Pomona Sprout saying that. It’s our very own Sophia Chan Siu-chee, and she’s not our minister of magic mushrooms, but our Secretary for Food and Health . Rather sounding like Harry Potter’s Hogwarts Herbology professor, though, don’t you think?
Here’s a summary of some of the issues in TCM. In short: there’s no science to it.
The effectiveness of Chinese medicine remains poorly researched and supported, and most of its treatments have no logical mechanism of action.A Nature editorial described TCM as "fraught with pseudoscience". According to standards of science-based medicine, there is no scientific basis for traditional Chinese concepts such as qi, meridians, and acupuncture points.[a] TCM theory and practice have no basis in modern science, and there is disagreement among TCM practitioners on what diagnosis and treatments should be used for any given person. Read on....But really. Imagine! Our Secretary of Food and Health, is promoting this. Promoting quackery. Rather like South Africa’s Thabo Mbeki promoting herbal remedies for AIDS, isn’t it?
I’d love it if TCM worked. But it doesn’t. That’s the overwhelming consensus of Science. Q: what do you call Traditional Chinese Medicine that’s been purified and tested? A: Medicine.
But that science is not in the mind of our patriotic, magic-believing Secretary of Health!
Sunday, 20 March 2022
|Elderly get vaccinated at MTR subway station|
I’ve been wondering. And now I think I have some of the answers.
1. Government advice: early on, as soon as vaccines became available, we elderly were advised as follows by the government: (a) get advice from your GP and (b) if you have a “condition”, wait for that condition to “settle down” before you get the jab. Is it any wonder they waited?
I remember this advice, as I’m in the elder category and have conditions: overweight and high BP. I did consult my doctor who would not give an opinion. I did my own research on the relative risks of side effects of vaccines v death from Covid and went ahead and got vaccinated as soon as I could.
But it’s not surprising that many elderly — following that government advice — did not do so. Especially when they asked their GPs and their GPs were unwilling to give advice.
ADDED: ironically, as elders were listening to government advice to “wait” before taking the jab, their carers and family were distrustful of government, largely because of mishandling of the 2019 demos and riots.
ADDED (21 March): today Carrie Lam said I would be “difficult” to legislate for mandatory vaccines for the elderly. Without explaining why. And without hesitating one jot to limit the freedoms of all Hongkongers, to protect the few who do not vaccinate. Weird.
2. Doctors not willing to recommend vaccine to their elderly patients. Why? Fear of being sued, and more reasons:
Medical practitioners in Hong Kong have been reluctant to recommend Covid-19 vaccines to patients with chronic health conditions for fear of the risk of adverse events. Significant numbers of doctors have also been hesitant about openly discussing or recommending vaccination even for those with no relevant health issues.…As for why they were unwilling to recommend vaccination, 31 per cent agreed there was “insufficient data to support recommendation”, while 41 per cent suggested “clearer [clinical] guidelines” were needed. Doctors were also about vaccine safety, with 36.2 per cent worrying about the potential for vaccines to have serious side effects in patients with a chronic illness
Above Clip from: Doctors’ concerns about Covid-19 liability must be addressed”. GP’s reluctance to advise vaccines was compounded by the failure of our government to indemnify doctors for advising elderly to get vaccinated. Indemnity that is apparently given in other jurisdictions.
3. Zero-Covid policy: early on this policy kept the virus at bay and deaths at zero. So there seemed little incentive to the elderly and their families to go get the jab. Until Omicron. Then it was too late.
4. Elderly were expected to travel to a vaccination centre. Government vaccine people should have gone to them, especially those in the nearly 1,000 elderly care homes. Lately, too late, they’ve just started doing that.
One “reason” for elderly vaccine hesitancy is bruited about: that they are “selfish”. I don’t buy that. Our mother is 100 and fully vaxxed. She and her friends at her residence all say “we do what we’re told”. That was always the case, so let’s not call them “selfish” for just doing what they — and their families — thought they were being told at the time. There is plenty above to explain why it might be that the elderly are so little vaxxed. And why they are dying in large numbers because of those low vaccine numbers. Best now to fix the oversights, the bulk of which are the government’s, and not call the victims “selfish”.
Saturday, 19 March 2022
71, 354 net departures in February. That’s 1% of our population. Adding to another one percent in January. And March 1st half is 43,200. Some may return, of course. But one wonders how many. Surely not as many as returned after 1997 handover when the worst fears were not realised.
On another page reports that two government pandemic advisers are advising: (1) gradual opening in late April or May or (2) even more gradual opening. So it’s either bad or worse, by those being driven crazy by the closures, or being driven bankrupt. Everyone we know here, who is not born here, and has another passport, is talking of leaving. I’ve thought of it myself, though the positives still outweigh the negatives.
Friday, 18 March 2022
|Click screenshot for article|
By the way, another thing that’s fading: our vaccine efficacy. Which we don’t know exactly, except that it does happen, and iirc, drops to around 50% efficacy after around 6 months. Our third shot was in November last.
The headline at the bottom is Xi Jinping giving his cadres a pep talk, while acknowledging that lockdowns have had economic and social effects. Probs the first time he’s done that. China currently having record number of cases per day. That said, it’s not abandoning its Zero Covid policy. Aka “dynamic zero policy”.
Thursday, 17 March 2022
|Some commenters say the pic scapegoats Gweilos. |
And it classes as “packed”. According to the headline…
It is really sad that weibo comments across the border now have more weight in decision making in Hong Kong than any science based evidence. Do it for the country even if it makes no sense at all reflects HK policy since the beginning. There was no swarming on beaches, plenty of space to be more distancianted than in any restaurant, mtr or shopping malls or hair salon.