I’ll say it again: I warned you. I did warn you! About the “Democratic” Socialists of America. I warned you in 2018.
No qualifiers in front of “Socialism”can change the fact that it’s Socialism. Not “warm and cuddly”, not “unthreatening-and-not-at-all-dangerous”; and no, not even “Democratic”. It’s always Socialism. And, in my experience, Socialism = communism. There’s no practical difference. The DSA is consuming and reshaping, socialist-ising the Democratic Party.
Result? The Democrats’ constituents today:
Today’s Democrats wouldn't tarnish their karma by attempting to win the votes of white men. They are strictly the party of unmarried women, status-conscious graduates, identity- and victimhood-based groups, and the unfathomably aggrieved offspring of assimilated immigrants.
And their policies?
It used to be said that Democrats were for acid, amnesty and abortion. Today, they are the party of Palestine, pronouns and police abolition.
Strange how these "vehicles" seem to have a mind of their own and plow into LGBT Pride parades and Christmas festivals. That's what we read in the headlines. A "vehicle" plowed into the crowd. Nary a mention of who might have been at the wheel or why....
Vince Dao can talk about this openly. As I cannot; this elderly, white, heteronormative, male. I mean, I can, but I’ll be labelled an “elderly, white, heteronormative, male” who has no right to speak because “no lived experience”.
Vince's parents are Vietnamese refugees from the 1970s. They've done well in America, as has Vince himself and he talks of the family's gratitude to the U.S. for taking them in, and allowing them to prosper.
Not so everyone. Many hate the west. Hate the country that's given them refuge. And try to kill random of its citizens. Guess who? I let Vince tell you. Spoiler: if you jumped to a conclusion, you're likely correct.
Despite which the MSM in Germany and the U.K. tries to paint this as somehow the fault of media in the west that's not as leftie as the mainstream broadcasters. Which is absurd, but, I guess, a distraction.
Which makes me think: "A bit of something is good. Too much of something is bad".
As in: "Moderation in everything".
Even water.
You need water to live. Without water you die. But too much you drown. You can even die from just drinking too much water!
Same with so much in life. Perhaps everything. Hence "moderation in everything". In Chinese: "The Great Mean".
And so it is with immigration. Some is good. Even necessary. Too much, especially unvetted, is bad. At the extreme, it can destroy countries.
As we see now in the Anglosphere. And in Europe. Too much; too unvetted; too unqualified; too unwilling to integrate; too unwilling to share values of the host country.
People on the right, conservatives, who are against unrestricted mass immigration are NOT against immigration. Just against the scale and the lack of qualifying.
Lionel Shrivertalks toToby Young. About the issue and her book about it, which I've read. "A Better Life". The title referring to the usual motivation of immigrants: to have a better life.
Which is indeed true. That's what immigrants want. A better life. Fair enough. Who can blame them.
But all too often that "better life" of the immigrants is at the expense of the lives of poor people in working class suburbs, who have no choice in the matter. For them, mass immigration is very often not at all better. More crime; higher prices, crowded schools, queues at hospitals. No respect, from guests, of their hosts. [*]
So the empathy here only works for the foreigner not the locals. Why?
Look at Bradford, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Tower Hamlets. Just in Shriver's adopted home of England.
But, you know, BIGOT! If you dare raise this issue. If you've got concerns. Racist! Xenophobe! Even... the bigDaddy of them all: "Islamophobe!"
Sigh...
=======================
[*] The epigraph of A Better Life:
"Mankind is divisible into two great classes, hosts and guests."
This is not me being crazy. This is not me being deluded in calling them Communists and Islamists. They themselves make no secret of it.
Who? Who am I talking about?
This has happened in the last few days, in the Democratic Primary for New York State elections. The Democratic Party candidates who won their primaries were all endorsed by Zohran Mamdani, Mayor of NYC and himself a self-declared Islamist and Communist. They have all offered their fealty to him, the new kingmaker of the Dems.
Each of them has said they hate America. Actually hate America. Yet representing people in New York State. Each has said that 911 was a good thing. Which they celebrated. They love and celebrate Hamas. They call for worldwide revolution. To “globalise the intifada”. Each glazes communism. Each is a member of the crypto-communist Democratic Socialists of America.
They despise America and its flag. One has said she used the American flag as toilet paper. Using the Flag as toilet paper! Shouldn’t that be disqualifying?!
But they’re winners of Democratic Primaries to be Representatives! In the Congress of New York State.
Sure, Free Speech and all. But these are Representatives. Who — to repeat and be extremely clear — have said they hate the country in which they live, they hate its flag and they support international terrorism. And yet are now one November election away from Representing the State of New York.
We must ponder this. Where in earth are we? And where is New York? Where is America?
Asmogold above is Zach Hoyt. He reckons this is a good thing because it makes clear where the Democratic Party is. Where that is, he reckons the majority of Americans is not going to like. So he thinks this is good for Republicans. Which is where he now stands. Or sits.
Like me, Asmogold is an old time Democrat. Like from the era of Bill Clinton or even Barack Obama. For sure I could buy into Clinton”s agenda, or even first-term Obama’s, of Free Markets, closed borders, stopping illegal immigration, law and order, helping the working class while expecting them to work if able. Staying out of foreign entanglements. Trying to control the budget.
But that’s no longer the Democratic Party of today. It’s changed and changing behind recognition.
I don’t agree with a hell if a lot of Asmogold’s views. But I do with many. His analysis of how this all came about is interesting and I largely buy it.
I sure hope Asmogold is right that the majority of Americans won’t buy this Communist- Islamist bullshit. And that these Communist-Islamist flunkies won’t win in November. If he’s wrong then America and the west is in real trouble.
Communism is bad enough. Islam is worse. The combination is like Russian nerve poison.
The Ruthless Podcast has the four fellas, all veterans of political campaigns, give us their take. Which is along similar lines as Asmogold, though less “ranty”.
The left just normalized so much insanity that basic self-preservation now gets called “far right extremism.”
Decades of open borders and failed assimilation delivered parallel societies, welfare strain, and crime spikes in city after city.
Green fanaticism delivered energy poverty and deindustrialization while virtue signaling.
Woke ideology delivered confused kids, erased women, and attacks on national identity.
And the result is voters across France, Germany, Italy, Poland, the UK and beyond are backing the parties the media smears as “far right.”
Those parties are simply saying what was common sense centrist a generation ago.
Secure borders. Citizens first. Affordable energy. Law and order. Protect children. Preserve your culture.
The Overton window got dragged so far left that reality, sanity, and common sense now look radical.
The Overton window got dragged so far left that reality, sanity, and common sense now look radical. H/t: @Rothmus
Meantime in Space:
Humanity's goal for the next century is... prevent WW3.*
Elon: "Okay, this is going to sound pretty crazy."
"I'd say the economy is 10 times the its current size in 10 years. Greater than. I feel like that's actually a fairly comfortable prediction."
"Obviously if there's like World War III or something. that that could put a kink in those plans or those expectations. In the absence of World War III, if current trends continue, I would say the the economy 10xes in 10 years and we have a base on the moon." H/t: @PeterDiamindis
If you didn’t hear her say it herself, you wouldn’t believe it. So barking crazy does it sound. So hateful to the very people she is supposed to look out for in her portfolio. Instead of which she favours and looks after the people coming in. Including the boat people. Aka illegal migrants.
Shabana Mahmood, the UK Home Secretary responsible for our borders, migration policy and national security, has just delivered one of the most divisive and contemptuous statements imaginable.
She openly declared that “the people you see holding the English flag are mostly white EDL bad people.”
Let that sink in.
The senior government minister charged with protecting Britain has smeared millions of ordinary English men and women – the very people who built this country, fought for it, and still wave the flag of St George with pride – as “bad people” simply for showing love for their own nation. Not criminals. Not rioters. Just everyday Brits displaying the Cross of St George at rallies, football matches or local events.
This isn’t a slip of the tongue. This is a senior Labour figure in one of the most powerful jobs in government openly demonising native British identity while overseeing the very policies that are changing the country beyond recognition. At a time when grooming gangs, knife crime, small-boat invasions and parallel societies dominate the headlines, our Home Secretary’s priority is to brand flag-waving Englishmen and women as the real problem.
The message couldn’t be clearer: patriotism from the indigenous population is now treated as extremism, while Qmass migration and cultural replacement are defended at all costs. Two-tier everything – two-tier policing, two-tier justice, and now two-tier patriotism. If you’re English and proud, you’re the threat. If you’re part of the imported communities she clearly favours, you get a free pass.
This level of contempt from the very top of government is dangerous and unforgivable. Britain belongs to the British first and foremost. The English flag isn’t a symbol of hate – it’s our heritage, our identity, our right. Shabana Mahmood’s remarks expose exactly why trust in this government has collapsed and why so many are demanding real change.
The British people are done being lectured and smeared in their own country. Time to put Britain and British identity first again before it’s too late. Enough is enough. 🇬🇧. Click
This is a major reason why mass immigration generates such intense resentment.
Many immigrants not only fail to identify with their new country and its native people, but they actively oppose them and everything the host culture represents.
Here she is, the same person defines “ethnic cleansing” as the permanent resettlement of an entire ethnic group from their homeland, yet openly celebrates the demographic decline of the white British population, declaring “We are winning.”
This isn’t treason. Treason implies betrayal from within a group.
This is something else entirely: a demographic invasion by people who were never part of the historic British nation. An ethnic cleansing per her own definition.
When native Britons say “send them all back,” it’s really hard not to sympathise.
IOW: It’s “ethnic cleansing” when talking about Gaza. It’s “we’re winning” when talking about the replacement of native Brits. Click
Saturday 16 May, 2026. “Unite the Kingdom” rally in London draws tens of thousands. Organised by long-time activist Tommy Robinson and reported on by ex Mumford & Sons frontman Winston Marshall.
They Rally to support pro-Britain values. Against uncontrolled mass immigration. Their vibe is diverse and somewhat Christian. Their flags are British: England, Wales, Scotland. The Union Jack. And the traditional flag of Iran, the pre-Islamist, pre-1979, one.
On the same day, there’s a counter demo. People who believe the main threat to Britain is not uncontrolled mass immigration, but the reaction to it, which they call “racism”. While they fly the “Palestinian” flag —purloined from the Arab League, an avowedly racist organisation — and the flag of the supremacist (and racist!) terrorist-theocrat regime of Iran. They hand out the Quran. They are pro Islamist. Pro Hamas. Anti-Israel.
Their vibe is Islam, support for the Iranian theocracy and for its terror proxies.
Click top video for Winston’s very balanced coverage of the day. Rather too balanced, if I’m honest, but there it is…
Please can we remember: across Europe, the U.K., the U.S., Australia and the rest of the Anglosphere, 75% of the electorates want a reduction in mass migration. That’s been steady for years. Yet the politicians in those countries, America aside, ignore the Broad Masses.
Kind Lie: Boys can become Girls. As in become. Actually become. Unkind Truth: no, they can’t.
Kind Lie: Islam is a “Religion of Peace”. Unkind Truth: no, it’s not.
Kind Lie: All illegal immigrants are good and productive. Unkind Truth: no, they’re not.
Kind Lie: all cultures are equal. Unkind Truth: no, they’re not.
Kind Lies lead to dysfunctional systems. As in dysfunctional cities. As in those run by progressive Democrats, people full of Kind Lies. Look at the mess in: LA, San Francisco, Oakland, Seattle, Portland, Chicago, New York, Minneapolis.
All of them went soft on crime, soft on drugs, soft on illegal immigration, soft on allowing sleeping g in streets. And we see the outcome. It’s there in front of our faces. LA has the additional stain of its shockingly incompetent handling of last year’s wildfires. Which burned thousands of houses and killed 15 homeowners.
Chuck Schumer, head of the Democratic Party in the Senate, rails against illegal immigration. in 2009. So did other Democratic luminaries: Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton. All said the same thing then that Donald Trump does now.
So, yeah. Democrats support control of illegal immigration. Then. Today, they support illegal immigration. Because… Trump. And… because illegal immigrants are a new voter base for Democcrats.
The only difference, the only one, is that then was them, and now is Orange Man Bad. It was a matter of national security then, which they now ignore because they hate the man saying it.
Imagine that your deeply held values are so lightly held that they evanescence when the person voicing it is someone you don’t like.
That is the crassest hypocrisy. That is enraging national security because of personality. It’s horrid.
Clip Maze Moore:
2009. Chuck Schumer gives one of the strongest speeches against illegal immigration ever given by a politician, from either side of the aisle.
This speech is mind-blowing. Hearing Schumer now insult ICE and Border Patrol and advocate for illegal immigrants, it's hard to believe that this video is real but it is.
Virtually every word of his 30 minute speech was about the need to curb illegal immigration. Schumer hit on everything from border security to biometric verification systems.
Schumer was not alone back then. Obama, Biden, and Hillary all took similar stances against illegal immigration during their campaigns for the 2008 Presidential election.
The Democrat party has moved so far left on immigration that by 2021, a Democrat President had effectively opened the border and ended deportations. The party just keeps moving further left on immigration. Democrat politicians now regularly incite violence against ICE by calling them nazis and gestapo.
Make sure to click on the Nioh Beeg link below to get the video of the joke. It’s sad-funny, and true.
Germany is so far gone that even immigrants have their own jokes about themselves all being on welfare while the natives work to pay for their lifestyle.
I will never understand this continent's willingness to put itself into servitude for the entire third world.
In the chart above, MENAPT = Middle East, North Africa, Pakistan and Turkey. It’s the blue line above. It never rises above zero, even during working ages.
This group of immigrants nevermakes a net positive financial contribution to Denmark. This is the same in other countries: Britain, Germany, France, Italy and the United States.
This single fact destroys the simplistic claim that “immigrants contribute to the economy”.
Some do. Many do. Very many don’t.
Including the single largest immigrant groups to Europe today.
These are a net drain on their host countries. Why is government debt such a curse these days? Well immigrants who do not contribute, who gloat at taking advantage of naive westerners, are most surely a major factor. How could they not be?
Me: I remember when we wondered -- I wondered -- why the Biden administration was opening the borders, letting in, willy nilly, millions of unvetted immigrants. Many/most/all illegal.
Perhaps it was the John Lennon "Imagine" reason. Imagining a "world without borders". Cool, baby. Peace ☮
Perhaps was their simple incompetence at sealing the southern border.
Or... or...
Perhaps it was because the Democrats were looking for more voters!
For illegals will always vote for the party that gives them free stuff. Like the Dems. Like we've seen them doing, most egregiously, in Minnesota.
"Conspiracy theory nutters", scream the Dems. It's "without evidence" (one of their favourite phrases).
Turns out that last reason is the true one. It wasn't a conspiracy theory. It was just a conspiracy. Which turned out to be true.
The Dems are going to allow all immigrants -- "undocumented" or not, non-citizens or not -- vote in American elections. That's insanity. From a national interest POV, but most certainly from a Rep POV.
But it's completely understandable from a "we-must-win-at-all-costs, no-matter-what-the-cost, and by-any-means-necessary" Democrat Party. Starting first, of course, with that testing ground for all progressive ideas, California.
In the red: Middle East, Africa, Latin America... See spreadsheet below for detail
This is just for the record. For reference.
From a 2025 Netherlands IZA study of the net contribution of immigrants to the European Union, over the lifetime, by country of origin. Those in the red are countries of origin of immigrants to Europe who end up taking more from the state than they contribute to the economy.
In short, all those coming from the countries above in red, are net takers from the state, over their lifetimes in the EU. Other studies, both in the United States and Europe, show the same pattern.
It's not fully clear from the above chart, so here's the spreadsheet:
I meant to post this at the time of the debates over the corruption in Minnesota, tied mainly to Somali immigrants, hence highlighting them above. They're the largest drain of any group on the public purse. They also were the most involved in the multi-billion dollar fraud that was uncovered in Minnesota, the investigations of which are ongoing, at the Federal level.
One must ask, surely, if such groups are not only a major drain on the state, but are also engaging in massive fraud, what on earth is the country doing continuing to let them into the country, let alone to encourage them. In spite of which, the pushback is always that to question the policy -- in America or the EU or Australia -- is that you're being "racist". Sure.
Also for the record. Views of Mainstream Democrats re immigration and deportation:
Courtesy@Xfreeze. The dotted line is replacement level, and all these are below it
Elon Musk — and Demographers— have been warning about this.
It’s NOT the population "bomb” we must fear. It’s the population bust.
Note how the very lowest birth rates are in East Asia. Where we live…. If I were a bit younger I'd try to give it a nudge along.
Demographer Stephen J.Shaw explains how immigration is not the answer to low birth rates. Neither for the country losing the emigrants nor for the country hosting the immigrants.
Shaw also explains how it is that humans survived major population declines in wars and plagues. But how and why it’s different today. We are circling down a population plug hole. We ignore it at our extreme peril.
It's a long video. But then complex issues need complex explanations.
Clip after clip of Muslims, in the Netherlands, openly mocking the land they've come to, openly saying they're there to take over ("we're here to take over, not to take part!"), openly saying that the native Dutch have no future in their own country...except under Islam.
Openly defying public order regulations and no one does anything about it, not complain, let alone arrest.
As one commenter says: "They're pissing on us and we call it rain".
Sahar, in the OP above, is right to point to the Hijra element of this. Hijra is a Muhammad-era tactic to take over other countries. By mass emigration to them. So those calling for Muslims that want more Islam "why don't you go to a Muslim country?" is irrelevant. Because they are in Europe, in the UK, in America, in Australia, specifically to turn those countries into Islamic countries. That's the task of pious Muslims. That's why they pray openly in the streets (adhan). That's why the guy walks around with boom box broadcasting the Koran (da'wah).
It's not so they can "practice Islam", it's so they can convert the host country.
Yes, it is colonisation. By any definition of the term.
Ignore the click-bait title of the OP. There is no "pushback". The most of any pushback is the redoubtable Geert Wilders stating -- clearly and reasonably as he has for decades now -- what needs to be done to control the ongoing Islamisation of Holland. But he is ignored. Because... you know... tolerance. Because... it's racism!
Sad.... It's happened so quickly. This is a land, Holland, I knew well once. Have visited often. Have loved. Becoming an Islamic state in front of our eyes. And when it really is, fully Islamic, instead of just submitting, it's not going to be pretty. It has not been pretty in any one of the other 57 Islamic states in the world.
Islamists in Germany openly call for Germany to become a Caliphate — a colony of Islam, a subject of the Islamic Empire — for Sharia law to be applied everywhere in Germany, for genociding the remaining Christians in Germany. Oh, and killing the Jews too, of course. Those that haven’t already fled.
German police do nothing. Because neither their weak bosses, nor the politicians allow them to do anything to stop the mayhem. To push back on a clear and present existential Islamic threat to the German Republic. Because… you know… tolerance!
This is suicidal empathy: empathy for poor oppressed immigrants, for free speech until Islam, when suddenly free speech will be no more. Because you can’t say what you like about the ideology of Islam. That’s Blasphemy!
The gorgeous kaleidoscope of diversity. The wonderful tapestry of multiculturalism….
Hence the increasing calls from many Germans for “Remigration”, aka deporting.
I’ve followed Tal Oran for years. It’s his video above. Pretty knowledgable about all these issues. But a bit soft in Islam, IMO. Like, he says “I’ve got no problem with Islam”. I do. Its core ideology, the Trinity of Islam, and the behaviour of its votaries, are an affront to enlightenment values. At the deep, fundamental, core.
First time I’ve seen this guy, a Nigerian, aka Bantu Dude,, and his channel, Bantu City Diaries. First time I’ve seen this question asked so clearly and so bluntly.
Namely:
"Why is it that Africans can't or won't make things?"
They could just "Copy and Paste" existing technologies. Bantu Dude mentions lots that they could be making in Africa. But they don't. Why?
The question is asked and discussed, but it's not really answered by the Bantu Dude.
My one contribution: Tribalism. Everything in Africa comes down to the tribe. It's your most precious group after yourself and your family. Not easy to undo tribalism. Bantu Dude doesn't touch on this. Perhaps because he knows it's just too difficult. If it'd been easy to overcome, Africa would have done so long ago.
We did a car trip from Cape Town in South Africa to Cairo in Egypt, back in 2011. Here's the blog of that trip. We enjoyed it tremendously and I think of it often. Some thoughts on the vid above, based on our trip.
Gordie and me. With the Mighty Mustang. Table Mountain in background. Cape Town, 6 September 2011
Comments on the Bantu Dude's video, at the top:
Africans are friendly: yes. We found that. Especially from southern to middle Africa. The more north, around northern Ethiopia onwards, to Sudan, Somalia, there's more reserve. My theory: it's coz an ideology they follow.
Africans value education: Yes. We saw, every day, young kids, usually in crip uniforms, marching off to school. They absolutely try to get their kids to school if they can.
Africa is not crowded. Agreed. It's generally not crowded; though major cities are. The larger, the more dense and dirty. But there's plenty of land. We drove hour upon hour, through empty lands, both desert and fertile lands.
There were deserts, in Namibia and Angola where I thought: "the Israelis could turn this green".
There were rivers, lakes and land, in Zambia, Tanzania, Kenya, where I thought: "the Chinese could turn these into food bowls".
The best roads in Africa that we drove on were built by the Chinese. I remember one lovely, lonely, long straight new highway through the Sudanese desert, all a kaleidoscope of oranges, reds, blues, khaki greens, and up the brown Nile. I so remember that day.
We drove at top speed. Foot to the metal. 100 mph, 110 mph, 120 mph as far as our old girl, a vintage vehicle would go, so fast the front kept lifting off the road, so you'd have no steerage for a disconcerting second or two, till you let it settle down. The speed made the trip even better.
So much of the desert is the same, you have to be fast to get the feeling of the changing desert, which it does -- change -- all the time, usually slowly; but at speed, it's like Kubrick's psychedelic scene in "2001: A Space Odyssey"... we on our own odyssey, over the crystal sands of a vast desert, flying along the one black asphalt strip, straight as a sudanese spear. Into the foothills of the Nile, past scenes from the Bible, white-clad children in a quarry, chipping stone. Sudanese slaves. Till we drop down to that Biblical river, the sluggish-brown Nile, palm-tree flanked, and feluccas, lateen-rigged, drifting lazily downstream.
When we asked why Africans hadn't helped build these roads, and others in Africa, we were told: "we wanted them to work with us, but they didn't. So we had to do it ourselves". That could just be an excuse. But we heard similar stories over and over, throughout Africa. Enough to think they were likely true. The Bantu Dude comments fit right in with this. "We're doing fine, boss; no need work hard on that road there". Kind of thing.
It's not true they won't build anything. With our car, a 50 year-old Ford Mustang, we could get any part repaired, or a bodgy-dodgy part made from scraps, on the spot. A Ford was the best car for Africa, because there's so many. Ditto Mercedes.
Any town we arrived in, any village, with a few cows, scrawny dogs and a few feral goats, has always got a "Hakim's Fix-it-Well Garage and Repairs" or a "Oil Be Back Car Repairs", that will make you a shock-absorber bush from an old tyre, or be happy to weld your broken tie rod. "Jus' in one short hour, sah". Those kind of shops are there, for sure. Just not the slightly bigger, slightly more ambitious factory, producing, say, paint, or... those shock absorber bushes we needed, let alone factories to make the shocks, or, heaven forfend, to build a whole car. That's the mystery that Bantu Dude is looking at.
Random fact: our route took us over some truly high elevation country. Like the middle of Ethiopia, at 12,000+ feet. Whole swathes of Africa are high elevation. I never knew that. Ethiopia was green-green when we drove through. Green. Not a hint of drought or famine of the past.
The Bantu Dude makes a point about relative populations on the earth in a century, given current birth trends: very few White people; very few Asians; lots and lots of Africans. So, he says, if Africans don't want to make things, or are not able to actually make things, or invent things, or improve technology, we're going to have an existential problem as homo sapiens.
Aussie politician: "Who's going to make your bed? Who's going to bathe you? Who's going to wipe your bum?".
Slave supporters pre Civil War: "Who's going to pick our cotton?"
I don't get how they don't see the hypocrisy. The racism of that view.
All the while destroying our own western values in Australia. The ABC, the Guardian, telling us that there are no "NO Go areas" in Australia. Certainly not Lakemba! And, at the end of the video, the Australian policeman telling her that she can't go there. That she can't walk the streets. Because she would be "causing a public order offence", even as it would be the Muslim attacking her.
This is sick stuff. This is crazy stuff.
Yes, Hanson should have said "Islam" and not "Muslims". That's an own goal. We can say, as I've often said, "I like the Chinese, but I don't like the Chinese Communist Party". Or "I like the Russians, but I don't like Soviete communisms". Or whatever. You get it. It's fine to not like the ideology. We don't have to hone in on the individuals, because that just gives a free kick to the apologists.
All in all, we're facing an extremely serious threat from a warlike, expansionist ideology, in all countries of the West. Which are so far responding like pussies.
Harris Sultan is a brave Aussie. Used to be a Muslim. Now an apostate. For which Islam would kill him. That's the ideology the "religion" that we are letting into -- encouraging into -- our countries.
