| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Friday 26 July 2024
“America Offers To Trade All Of Its Communists For Democratic Protesters In Hong Kong” |The Babylon Bee
Dangers for western civilisation | Zuby
![]() |
Click above, or here. |
- Is it our hubris? Maybe so, maybe we feel we’re invulnerable. But no civilisation is invulnerable.
- Is it our complacency? Most assuredly. We are constantly told that “you’re exaggerating the problem”.
- Is is our malice? Well, not ours. But certainly it’s the malice of our enemies. Who now live in large numbers in our borders.
- Is it our folly? Most assuredly. And I think that’s the worst one. Our folly. That is our wilful ignorance. We turn away our faces, because the problem is too big. At first it was too small, and we could ignore it. Then it was too big to handle.
"The institution of the welfare state can't survive this..."
Thursday 25 July 2024
Post by Hussain Abdul-Hussain on X
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feel the enthusiasm for Kamala!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, she was “Border Czar” Part 2
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, Kamal Harris really WAS named “Border Czar” in 2021
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Do not fall for this bull” | Greg Foreman
![]() |
Click above for the video |
Wednesday 24 July 2024
“Can Kamala Harris win the election?” | Australian ABC radio question
“Can Kamala Harris win the election?”
This was the poll question on the Aussie ABC radio station, Canberra AM666, today 24 July.
And of course the answer was a resounding “yes”. 82% Yes and 18% no.
That included my texted answer which was “Yes” she could but “No” she shouldn’t.
ABC Radio rang and asked me if I would like to be “Texter of the Day”(more below).
Here’s my texts. Text ONE:
Of course America CAN elect a woman president. The question is should America elect THIS woman.
Hillary Clinton didn't lose because she was a woman. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.
So is Kamala Harris. She was the worst performer in the 2020 primaries. She didn't gain a single delegate vote and pulled out before Ohio.
Her vice presidency has hardly be crowned with glory. But rather beclowned by silliness.
She is deeply ensnared with all of Biden's policies, including the disastrous Afghan withdrawal, Gaza, Ukraine, inflation etc...
PF, Hong Kong
Text TWO:
In answer to the anchor, James Vyver, who said that “of course the Veep in the US has limited opportunity to be out of the President’s shadow”:
"The VP is in a shadow"
Kamala Harris was named by Biden as his Border Czar.
She famously (infamously!) lied about having visited the border when she hadn't and was failed to make any inroads into the vast numbers entering the southern border illegally.
Her times as DA of San Francisco and AG of CA were also overall a failure. She's famous at failing upwards.
So, again, woman YES, this woman NO...
PF Hong Kong
Text THREE:
"Can Kamala Harris win the election?"
I've already said yes she can, but no she shouldn't.
Because of her policies.
I'm sat here in Hong Kong listening all afternoon to the topic being discussed on ABC 666, including by the "thoughtful women" and am amazed that there's been no mention of the most important thing: her policies. Which is to say, the policies of Joe Biden.
All you've discussed is the fact that she's a woman and a WOC. Nothing about what she would do as president.
There are more people than you imagine, in the US, who care about this. And who find marked differences between the GOP and the Dems. And who choose those of the GOP.
You should surely cover the Policy issues at least a bit. No?
PF, Hong Kong
The reason for 3 whole texts was that the show was on for hours and I happened to listen to it for hours. Not that I usually listen to Australian radio, but sometimes, for a change of pace.
The ABC people in Canberra rang me and asked me if I’d be the “Texter of the Day”. Which is what, I asked. It’s where I get phoned up by the host of the show, asked for a song to play and to answer his questions. I declined. I was sure my own views were very counter to his, and I didn’t feel like being slammed, as anyone can be, no matter who, if the host of the show is against you. Maybe too paranoid, but that’s it.
Overall, the fact remains this: that the thing the ABC thought most important about Kamala Harris were her sex and colour. Not anything to do with her ideas, her policies, or her performance to date. About as relevant as saying that having ginger hair or brown eyes is relevant. (“The first POC who is also ginger, Yippee!”).
ABC and most of the phone-ins seemed to think that Kamala is new on the scene. Which to them she probably was. And thus the whole panoply of the world lay in front of her. They had no idea of how bad she’d been as the DA of San Francisco or during her time as AG of California, or as a short-term Senator for CA, or as Veep.
There’s a 3-part series on the life and jobs of Kamala Harris, by the Daily Wire. Of course it’s critical. But a counter to the encomia served up by mainstream media. And as far as I’ve fact-checked it, it’s correct. Part 1 here.
In the DA and AG jobs she began the progressive policies that have ruined the city and the state.
San Francisco (and others, like LA, Seattle, Portland, San Diego) are now ghost town in their CBDs: shops and businesses have fled the rampant crime, a direct result of the policies of Kamala and her coterie. Over 800,000 people have left California in the last three years, because of the waste and destruction of the progressive policies of Kamala and her male doppelgänger, Gavin Newsome.
None of this factored in to the ABC Radio Canberra afternoon talk subject. It was all about her sex and colour. Her immutable characteristics. Like her brown eyes. And about as important.
“Kamala hype machine revs up”
Usually it’s:
Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line.
But with this election and with Kamala Harris it’s:
Republicans fall in love, Democrats fall in line.
And boy! have they fallen in line, those Dems and the mainstream media. Snap! Kamala was hated by both Left and Right until five minutes ago. Now she’s a natural wonder, a national treasure. Snap in line. To a line set by the New York Times daily pod, The Show.
This deification of Kamala was the easiest thing to predict, given the behavior of the mainstream media. She was horrible until five minutes ago and now she’s wonderful.
Here’s a take. Common on the conservative side. Unseen on the liberal media side.
And an another take from a Black conservative. The Black vote being critical in this election.
And lthe Left media lying outright that Kamala was never appointed “Border Czar” (she was). Relevant because she screwed it up. If she hadn’t been appointed how could she have screwed it up, right? But she was so appointed and we all have the receipts
I know - we know - many liberal friends who only watch CNN, or the Australian ABC, or BBC, or only read the Guardian headlines, who will believe the new narrative about Kamala. That she’s wonderful, smart, strong…. And believe that her failure as Border Czar is just a “right wing talking point, a lie”.
You can only know the truth — or at least something closer to the truth — if you read from both left and right. Which is part of my aim here. To give another side to liberals.
Hong Kong is more democratic than the United States
Hong Kong is more democratic than the United States.
That’s my claim for today.
Consider: here in Hong Kong, the leader of the city is the Chief Executive currently John Lee. The way he was chosen was by an Election Committee, which took soundings in the community, before putting candidates to the vote. Not universal suffrage, to be sure. But a kind of democracy because the views of the people, the broad masses of the lumpen proletariat, are taken into account.
Now, consider the current ruling party of the United States, aka The Democratic Party. They installed their candidate Joe Biden after a rigged “Primary” vote -- in which nearly all the States he was the only candidate -- but then he trailed in the polls, so a small cabal in the Dem party decided to remove him and install his deputy in his place. No will of the people. No say by the people. Not even an “Election Committee. That’s crazy, and at the very least not democratic. Whatever it is -- plutocracy, autarchy, fascism, a putsch, an insurrection -- one thing it most assuredly is not is “Democratic”.
Therefore: I think it’s objectively true to say that, as of today, and as of how the Democratic Party has trashed the will of the people -- aka “Democracy" -- that Hong Kong is more democratic than the United States.
I would like that to change back to the norms we had, before the Dems trashed the norms. Little hope of that, for now.
Look at how commenter Stephen A. Smith talks of the way Biden was ditched. With no shame. It was simply because Biden wasn’t polling well. That’s not the way this is supposed to work. Biden was the Dem candidate because of a process, which included a (kind of) primary system. He went through that and was duly appointed. Until he was un-appointed.
Of course, it could always be that the excuse given is that Biden is cognitively impaired, and that’s why he was ditched. Fine, I get that. So do many, including Dems and Reps. But then if that’s the case, how can he continue to be president? Yet there he is, being president. (At least we assume so, as we’ve seen nothing of Biden, neither hide nor hair, for five days, since he caught Covid. Hmmm....).
All of this is over and above the rampant Lawfare that the Biden administration has indulged in. Or the student loan forgiveness, that goes against the Constitution. Or the vaccine mandates which were also unconstitutional. Or bringing in tens of millions of illegal migrants and then giving them the vote -- in the hope they’ll vote Dem, natch. Or inviting Putin to make just a “minor incursion” into Ukraine, and see how well that went.
Many questions to answer. And the most pressing: What’s happened to “Democracy” under the “Democrats”??
Tuesday 23 July 2024
"These Were Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle's Toughest Lines Of Questioning"
There are so many videos out there on the Congress questioning of the Secret Service Director, Kimberley Cheatle. Some tough stuff.
Today's [22 July] House Oversight Committee hearing, Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle experienced almost universally difficult lines of questioning, with these lawmakers serving up the toughest interrogations.
The attacks on Cheatle are bipartisan. They really want her out. The reason the Dems are onside to fire her, is that they are also in the cross-hairs of some random 20year old with an AR15.
The failures of the Secret Service are so egregious. They currently stand, in my view, as 50/50 as between (1) it was a cock-up and (2) it was a deliberate oversight (to allow the rando to get on the roof).
Megyn Kelly has her take here.
Monday 22 July 2024
"Biden Staff Break Silence On His Mental Decline” | Cenk Uyghur and Ana Kasparian
So this is the White House and the legacy media that’s lied all these years. And now we should believe them when they tell us how ayyy-mayyy-zzzing Kamal Harris is going to be? And what a “threat to democracy” Donald Trump is?
History: Biden quits the race!
Blacks for Trump
![]() |
Click above for the video |
- “3 baby mamas
- mug shot
- 34 felonies
- got shot
- Trump is the first black president"
And the ‘hood got his back.
Funny stuff from the educated lads at The Lotus Eaters. And some funny vids about the Trump shooting, from the Black community.
Sunday 21 July 2024
Australian Greens Senator rides with the Terrorist Bunch
Saturday 20 July 2024
Who is ethnically cleansing whom?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
My CO2 levels way below global average
My CO2 meter reading 400 parts per million of Carbon dioxide |
Mr Google tells me the global average is 421 ppm.
My CO2 Meter tells me that it’s only 400 ppm in my room right now.
I wonder: how can this be?
Is it a problem with the meter? I doubt it as it’s been more than that mostly over the years. And the battery is fine.
So my actual room is keeping my carbon dioxide down?
I mean, it is true that I have solar panels on the roof. Maybe god gives you better CO2 for virtue points. Then again, we also have nuclear powering a third of our lights. Isn’t that supposed to be bad?
Mystery.
No, Biden is not a “good man"
![]() |
Click above for the video |
Reason for saying it is: that everyone that’s out to stop Joe Biden from running, is saying something like “I love Joe Biden, but it’s time for him to step down”, or “Joe Biden is a good and decent man, who has been a great president, but he must call a halt to his candidacy”. Or similar.
And I’ve been thinking: “What’s great or good about Joe Biden?” Because I can remember when he lied about his law degree, when he lied about his son’s death, and lied about the driver of the truck that crashed and killed his wife way back. And that he lied about Trump and the “fine people” hoax. And that he pulled out of Afghanistan, precipitously, leaving dead Americans and American supporters behind, and then lied about that, that he misled the Russians on Ukraine by encouraging them to invade the east, that he slow-walked the support for Israel, so that they couldn’t finish the job of killing Hamas, that he pumped money into the economy during Covid, setting the scene for inflation.
That he’s had racist leangings going way back to his friendship with the Grand Wizard of the KKK. That he betrayed Clarence Thomas at his Senate confirmation hearings, when he, Biden, was chair of the committee. A story told in detail by Thomas in his memoirs.
And on and on and on. Not to mention his deliberate ignoring of his 7th grand-child because she was incovenient.
But there’s more and the more is covered by Greenwald in the video above.
Biden is, in short, a vile man. Not just not “a good man”, but an actual full-on vile man.
When Biden goes -- and it’s now more “when” than “if” -- it’ll be unlamented by most. And certainly unlamented by me.
He’ll only be lamented, with crocodile tears, one imagines, by those in the Dem party who feel obliged to be nice to him. He, himself, has never been nice, except to people in his own family.
He will have lived up to the judgements of Barack Obama and Robert Gates (Defence sec under Clinton and Bush):
Obama said “Never underestimate Joe’s capacity to fuck things up.”
Gates said: “Joe Biden has been wrong about every foreign policy issue in the last 40 years”.
Friday 19 July 2024
“What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe” | Spain 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Would you rather have the U.K. taken over by Russia or Islam?”
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Cart Dog
Thursday 18 July 2024
“Victory from Allah and an imminent conquest"
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||
|
Wednesday 17 July 2024
“We have no idea how deep Secret Service incompetence goes” | Alan Dershowitz
![]() |
Click above for the video |
When the shot is taken by the assassin it’s already too late. The errors have already been made.
DEI gets a deep serve by Dershowitz. Maybe responsible for the drop in Secret Service standards. We know, for example, that the physical standards set for women in the SS are far lower than for men. Where physicality is important, DEI has no place.
On the media: he reads everything. Which you must do to get closer to the truth. Even if you never reach it. It remains the truth that liberals read less widely than conservatives. That is, conservatives more often read liberal news outlets than liberals read conservative outlets. Part of the reason being, of course, that the so-called legacy media is mostly on the left. Think CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NYT, WaPo.