There’s a big difference between Goals and Systems.
Not that there’s anything wrong with having a goal. But it does become an obstacle to reaching itself, if it’s just “A Goal”, a bright glittery object. With a capital "G".
Here’s an example of the difference at its starkest.
Let's say the goal is: “Affordable Housing for all”.
The Goal-oriented folks (capital "G") will march on the streets. They'll wave placards plastered with the Goal “Affordable Housing for all”, “We Demand Affordable Housing”, “Affordable Housing is Housing Justice”.
They will set up a Petition on Move.org, demanding Affordable Housing for all.
They will give fiery speeches in Congress, write op-Ed’s in the New York Times. You get the picture.
And the picture is that after a year or two of this, they will still have the "Goal", capital "G", but nothing will have changed and no progress will have been made to the goal (lower case "g").
Systems-oriented folks on the other hand, do have the same goal -- Affordable Housing -- but they break it down into Systems.
So, for Affordable Housing they’d go:
- How much Affordable Housing do we have now?
- How much do we need?
- What resources do we need to get from (1) to (2)? Lumber, cement, steel, people.
- Where will the finance come from?
- What regulations stand in our way and what can we do about them?
- What manpower do we need to reach the goal?
- Where will that manpower come from?
- How do we increase it?
- How do we get the public behind our effort?
- How do we measure and report our performance?
Again, you get the picture. One side has a Goal with upper case "G" and much huffing and puffing.
Another side has a goal in lower case, with the Systems, capital “S” -- the more important part of reaching that very same goal.
One side Dreams. The other side Does.
California is a classic case of a state run by Goal-oriented people. What a place like California needs is some Systems-oriented people to actually make some progress toward those goals.
But it doesn't happen. In city after city and state after state, we see places run by Goal-oriented Dreamers, and the people keep voting in the Dreamers back in! Rather than the Doers. Sad, really. To me, anyways, as I watch previously great American cities fall into despair and disrepair.
Here Endeth the Lesson. (Which lesson is: vote for Doers, not Dreamers).