This is really a case of “one screen, two movies”. That is, the same event seen two different ways by two people. Here, it’s the criminal cases against Trump. One side, the Left, sees the cases as legitimate. “No one is above the law”. The other side, the Right, sees it as “Lawfare”. Election interference. As cases brought against Trump because he’s the Republican candidate the Left are so afraid of. Trumped up. heh!
Thing is: one of these is more correct than the other. I take the side of the Right here, both because of the cases themselves, and because on every other case where there are two movies on the one screen, the Right has been correct. Take it: the Russia Collusion. No, there was none; proof: Mueller Report and Durham Reports. Hunter Biden Laptop: Left said it was Russia disinformation; No it wasn’t. Proof: Hunter and Joe have admitted it, as even the NYT, MSNBC, CNN have acknowledged.
The four cases against Trump are so absurdly andso patently invented. Everyone, even the supporterdre, call them “novel”. Even people on the Left acknowledge this. The likes of lifetime Democrats, legal experts, Law professors Jonathan Turley (D) and Alan Dershowitz (D). They’ve all said: there is no case here. None of them. They are invented. They are tortured to make a case. And in the current “hush trial” case, there is not even a crime they can see, to answer.
Victor Davis-Hanson is a professor, a classics scholar, and he lays it out:
Do not believe the White House/mainstream media-concocted narrative that the four criminal court cases—prosecuted by Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, Jack Smith, and Fani Willis—were not in part coordinated, synchronized, and timed to reach their courtroom psychodramatic finales right during the 2024 campaign season.
These local, state, and federal Lilliputian agendas were designed to tie down, gag, confine, bankrupt, and destroy Trump psychologically and physically. They are the final lawfare denouement to years of extra-legal efforts to emasculate him. More
