LATER:Any comments I make that don’t fully support the WSJ editorial are going to seem apologist. So let’s be clear: moves to restrict the press are Not Good. Anywhere. And we deplore. Clear.
“Having said that…” as says Larry David…having said that, the editorial is farrago of hyperbole and falsehoods.
Take the first sentence: “China’s shredding of Hong Kong’s autonomy is reaching new levels of nastiness”. Hyperbole. Alarmist. Click-bait, sure, but still. “Shredding”? Hong Kong has what I’ve called it’s “Seven Freedoms” and these remain intact. (Ok, largely intact).
Apple Daily and Stand News have been closed down. Apple most have heard of, though I doubt many in the west would know that it was a trashy sensationalist tabloid, often outright hysterical. We gave up advertising in it as we got few leads to our business, its demographic not being ours — young people looking for further education, which says, well… something, anyway.
Few in the west will have heard of Stand News, until it was closed, but during 2019 one in three Hingkongers was reading it.
I wish they hadn’t been closed, of course. That’s me, a comfortable westerner living comfortably in Hong Kong. But when you’re dealing with an authoritarian government don’t be surprised when they do authoritarian stuff. China is the sovereign and China is run by the Communist Party. Not the Lib-Dems or the Democrats or even a Republican Party. It’s a Marxist-Leninist Communist Party (it’s in its Constitution). We, here at ForsytheLee, weren’t surprised when they acted to quell separatist forces — and let’s be clear there were separatist forces openly at work during 2019. We were surprised that there were so many people fervently believing that Hong Kong could be independent. But it’s true. There were many.
If anything we were surprised Beijing acted so late and so mildly. There were many at the time talking of a major crackdown with tanks and troops on the streets. Some were even hoping for this, part of a strategy of goading police and the government to overreact so they could show the world how evil they were, and thus justify foreign direct intervention. Such were some of the dreams. But the only time the troops did leave their barracks in 2019 was to help clean up a street in Sheung Wan. A street that had been trashed the day before by rioters (or “peaceful protesters” if you must). The pictures were troops with brooms and buckets, not bullets and bodies.
The action when it came was imposition of a National Security Law. Unwelcome, perhaps, but allowable under Hong Kong’s Basic Law. All defence and national security issues are with the sovereign, Beijing. The only people surprised and “shocked” were the naive youngsters hailed as vanguards of “freedom and democracy”, and all their acolytes and foreign bien pensants.
[More to come …]
A note on Apple Daily. I read it from time to time, mainly because we occasionally advertised our business in it. I’d also wanted to write Letters but they had no letters page. That’s the way with most of the Chinese language media. Before the ructions of 2019, they were a sensationalist tabloid, gruesome, in-your-face car crash photos in glorious colour on the front page. Imagine a News of the World (now also defunct!) but more gory and in Chinese; that’s Apple Daily. Come 2019 they became more overtly political, all anti-government (so-called “yellow” press vs the pro-gov “blue” press). What sealed its fate was owner Jimmy Lai’s not just outspoken anti-communism, but his calling for Hong Kong independence. I don’t know how often I have to say it, but “independence” is the biggest of no-nos for Beijing. We recall Lai in Taiwan calling for US to “liberate” Hong Kong. His staff marched in the streets with US flags, singing The Star Spangled Banner, for goodness sake. That’s pretty shocking stuff to anyone, let alone authoritarian communist apparatchiks.
Stand News closure is more troubling, as they were rather more measured in their support for the 2019 demos and rioting. They too were “yellow” but principled yellow. Yellow mellow. What sealed their fate was success.
WSJ again: “… the government tore down a statue commemorating victims of the Tiananmen Square massacre”. Actually, it wasn’t.
Wall Street Journal again: “South China Morning Post now toes the Party line …”. That is incorrect.
WSJ: “Nobody is safe in Hong Kong”. This also wrong. It’s likely to be if you are high profile and choose to criticise “the X-factor”, our dear Premier Xi Jinping. But that aside you’re fine. And in the general sense of safety, Homicide and violent crime, Hong Kong is exceptionally safe. In most cases the safest in the world. Whereas in the US homicides and violent crimes are in the rise, including the home of the WSJ, New York.
And we also have an excellent world class and available to all medical system as an older person who’s had hear issues and operations here I attest to that from my own “lived experience”.
Not, to repeat, that there’s a lot to criticise. Of course there is. But to claim “No one is safe in Hong Kong” as the click-bait headline for an article full of hyperbole and plain wrong, is simply, itself, wrong.
ADDED: It’s Hill & Knowlton, so, sure, an agenda, as everyone has an agenda. But you can bet that many more companies will be reading assessments like these, than those of WSJ:
I came across the above snippet when I was looking for evidence the claim that China plans $US 15 Trillion on renewables to 2050. Over $US 550 billion per year. Or more than the global expenditure on renewables in 2020. I haven’t found that yet. Could be. China is already the world’s largest investor in both Wind and Solar.
ADDED: Hong Kong Brain Drain. Bloomberg